UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CAROL LOEB SHLOSS
CASE NO. C 06 3718 JW HRL
Plaintiff(s),
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
SEAN SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee
of the Estate of James Joyce, and THE
ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline:
March 2007________________________________
Dated:_11/9/06___
___/S/______________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
CAROL LOEB SHLOSS
Dated:__11/9/06__
__/S/_______________________
Attorney for Defendant
THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE
Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Document 18 Filed 11/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
Shloss v. Sweeney et al
Doc. 18
Dockets.Justia.com
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
Mediation
Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
90 days from the date of this order.
Other