IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO.
D.T. MARSHALL, et al.,
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 5) are
recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is adopted.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No.
1) is denied because petitioner has failed to
exhaust state remedies.
Case 2:06-cv-00827-MHT-DRB Document 7 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
Savage v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1)
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
petitioner, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DONE, this the 28th day of September, 2006.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:06-cv-00827-MHT-DRB Document 7 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 2 of 2