United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances
underlying the present motion.
2
As used herein, “Exhibit D” refers to Exhibit D to the Declaration of Leslie A. Pereira,
filed herein on October 12, 2006 (“Pereira Declaration”).
ORDER, page 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et
al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 06-0198 JW (PVT)
ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL REPLY BRIEF
AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
On November 22, 2006, Defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (“Defendant”) filed
a request to seal a reply brief Plaintiffs filed with the court, and certain related exhibits.1 The parties
also filed a stipulation, and then a corrected stipulation, in which Plaintiffs indicate they do not
oppose the motion to seal (although they reserve the right to reassert at a later time the arguments
and evidence contained in the reply and supporting papers). Based on the motion and the file herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to seal is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN
PART as discussed below.
The motion is GRANTED as to portions of Exhibit D,2 as set forth in this paragraph.
Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 73 Filed 11/29/2006 Page 1 of 4
Netscape Communications Corporation et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al
Doc. 73
Dockets.Justia.com
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
To the extent the brief cites Exhibit D as support for a statement reflected in both the
privileged and non-privileged portions of Exhibit D, the presence of the information in the non-
privileged portion of Exhibit D renders the citation non-objectionable.
ORDER, page 2
Specificall