1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OHS West:260248233.2
-1-
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01389-RS
G. HOPKINS GUY, III (State Bar No. 124811)
hopguy@orrick.com
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. 173985)
nchatterjee@orrick.com
MONTE COOPER (State Bar No. 196746)
mcooper@orrick.com
THERESA A. SUTTON (State Bar No. 211857)
tsutton@orrick.com
YVONNE P. GREER (State Bar No. 214072)
ygreer@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
FACEBOOK, INC., and MARK
ZUCKERBERG,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as
CONNECTU, LLC), CAMERON
WINKLEVOSS, TYLER WINKLEVOSS,
DIVYA NARENDRA, PACIFIC
NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC.,
WINSTON WILLIAMS, WAYNE CHANG,
and DAVID GUCWA AND DOES 1-25,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01389-RS
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
CONNECTU’S CIVIL L.R. 6-3
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
Case 5:07-cv-01389-RS Document 80 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 1 of 7
The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al
Doc. 80
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OHS West:260248233.2
-1-
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01389-RS
I.
INTRODUCTION
ConnectU’s Motion to Enlarge Time should be denied. ConnectU’s motion purports to be
brought pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3, which permits modifications of existing deadlines, but
does not meet any of the explicit requirements of that Rule. Notably, a cursory review of
ConnectU’s papers (and, more specifically, its Proposed Order) leaves no doubt that ConnectU’s
“Civil L.R. 6-3 Motion to Enlarge Time” is an attempt to circumvent this Court’s motion practice
rules. ConnectU’s motion is replete with requests for relief and argument that are not authorized
by Rule