IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable Marcia S. Krieger
Civil Action No. 06cv00831MSKCBS
BRANDON J. DARDANIS,
ROBERT A. BALDWIN,
ORDER SETTING FED. R. CIV. P. 16 HEARING
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment filed
by the Plaintiff. In light thereof, a hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and
D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 is necessary.
IT IS ORDERED:
A hearing is set for July 12, 2006 at 8:00 a.m. in Courtroom A901 of the United
States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel who
will try the case shall attend the hearing.
No later than June 7, 2006, the parties shall meet and confer regarding the
contents of the proposed scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f).
On or before June 28, 2006, and in conformance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f),
D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1, 16.2 and 26.1, and this Order, the parties shall prepare
and submit a proposed scheduling order. The proposed scheduling order shall be
in the form specified by D.C.COLO.LCivR Appendix F except that:
It shall not contain a signature line for a judicial officer.
It shall address the following:
The identity and pertinent provisions of any contract(s) and/or
The particular dispute regarding such provisions.
The stipulated facts which bear upon the Court's interpretation of
the contract(s) and/or promissory note(s).
Case 1:06-cv-00831-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 05/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
Dardanis v. Baldwin
Whether discovery is needed and if so, what discovery is related to
the issue of interpretation of the contract(s) and/or promissory
Whether discovery is needed as to another issue.
It shall not address the matters set forth in Section 7 (Case Plan and
Schedule), Section 9 (Other Scheduling Issues) or Section 10 (Dates for
Further Conferences) of Appendix F.
At the scheduling conference, the parties shall be prepared to address