I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
I 1
12
13
1 4
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 8
1 9
20
2 1
22
23
24
25
26
P . CRAIG CARDON, Cal . Bar No. 168646
BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, Cal . Bar No. 196996
BRIAN D . ANDERSON, Cal . Bar . No. 221645
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 17`x' Floo r
San Francisco, CA 94111-4106
Telephone: (415) 434-9100
Facsimile: (415) 434-394 7
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
Digital Envoy, Inc
DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No . 168452
DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-510 0
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
Google Inc .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A
SAN JOSE DIVISION
DIGITAL ENVOY, INC .,
CASE NO . : C 04 01497 RS
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
MOTION TO LEAVE TO FILE FOR
RECONSIDERATION
V .
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant /Counterclaimant .
1 .
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b), Digital Envoy, Inc . ("Digital Envoy") seeks
leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court's November 8, 2005 Order ("Order")
granting in part and denying in part Google Inc .'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
Regarding Digital Envoy, Inc.'s Damages Claims .
2 7
28
_
MOTION TO LEAVE TO FILE FOR
W02-SF :5 1313161477284 .1
_ 1
RECONSIDERATION
Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 381 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 1 of 7
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
I
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 8
1 9
20
2 1
22
2 3
24
25
26
27
28
II .
ARGUMENT AND CITATION OF AUTHORITIES
The Court's Order correctly ruled that Section 8 of the parties' License
Agreement did not apply to Digital Envoy's claim for unjust enrichment' authorized by an d
arising under California's Uniform Trade Secrets Act . Nevertheless, now Google is asking the
Court to expand the application of certain findings in the Order in an effort to "bar[] any
monetary recovery at all" by Digital Envoy in this action . See November 22, 2005 Order
Granting Google's Request for