1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
No. CIV S-06-1465 FCD KJM PS
vs.
BARBARA CLARK,
Defendant.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/
and related actions.
No. CIV S-06-1466 FCD KJM PS
No. CIV S-06-1468 FCD KJM PS
No. CIV S-06-1470 FCD KJM PS
No. CIV S-06-1471 FCD KJM PS
No. CIV S-06-1473 FCD KJM PS
/
The above-titled actions were related by order dated July 11, 2006. Findings and
recommendations previously issued in case nos. CIV S-06-1467 and CIV S-06-1472, which were
also related to these actions.
Defendant has filed a notice of removal of a state court petition of employer for
injunction prohibiting violence or threats of violence against employee in which plaintiff seeks a
stay away order against defendant. There is no basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction
evident in the state court action. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), this action should therefore be
Case 2:06-cv-01473-FCD-KJM Document 5 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
(PS) Adventist Health System (AHS) et al v. Clark
Doc. 5
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
summarily remanded.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the above-titled actions be
summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Placer.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections
shall be ser