United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of CaliforniaIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GIL CROSTHWAITE, in his capacity as Trustee,
et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
CANYON SPRINGS ENTERPRISES DBA RSH
CONTRUCTION SERVICES, et al.,
Defendants
/
No. C 06-4451 SBA
ORDER
[Docket No. 3]
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion For Issuance Of Right To
Attach Order And Writ Of Attachment Or Alternatively Temporary Protective Order ("Plaintiffs'
Motion") [Docket No. 3]. Having read and considered all the papers filed in connection with this
motion and being fully informed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' alternative request for a
Temporary Protective Order, as follows:
1) Plaintiffs shall file an undertaking in the amount of $10,000.00 before this Temporary
Protective Order shall issue. Plaintiffs shall file the undertaking in the amount of $10,000.00 no
later than August 1, 2006. In the event that Plaintiffs fail to file such undertaking, this Temporary
Protective Order shall not issue.
Case 4:06-cv-04451-SBA Document 9 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 1 of 3
Crosthwaite et al v. Canyon Springs Enterprises et al
Doc. 9
Dockets.Justia.com
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
2) Defendant Canyon Springs Enterprises doing business as RSH Construction Services
("Canyon Springs") is a Corporation.
3) The amount sought to be secured by the attachment under Plaintiff's Motion is $70,371.17.
4) The claim upon which Plaintiffs' Motion is based is one upon which an attachment may be
issued pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 483.010.
5) Plaintiffs have established the probable validity of the claim upon