382687.01
1 KEKER & V AN NEST, LLP
JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649
2 DARLYN J. DURll - #169825
ASHOK RAANI - #200020
3 71 0 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
4 Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 NETFLIX, INC.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
BLOCKBUSTER, INC.,
a Delaware
14 corporation, DOES 1-50,
15
16
17
Defendant.
AN RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
18
19.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 06 2361 WHA
STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING
& (PROPOSED) ORDER
Complaint fied: April 4, 2006
Date: TBD
Time: TBD
Dept: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup
STIPULATION CONTINING HEARIG & (PROPOSED) ORDER
CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 60 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.
Doc. 60
Dockets.Justia.com
1 WHEREAS, on October 11,2006, proposed intervenor Dennis Dilbeck ("Dilbeck") filed
2 a motion requesting to intervene in this case, with a hearing date set for November 16,2006;
3 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Netflix, Inc. ("Netfix") and defendant
4 and counterclaimant Blockbuster Inc. ("Blockbuster") were not aware
of Dilbeck's request to
5 intervene until they received his motion through the Court's Electronic Case Filing system;
6 WHEREAS, the parties therefore have been permitted only two weeks to consider their
7 position on the proposed intervention and submit briefing on their position, and additional time
8 to consider and brief
the issues presented by Dilbeck's request for inteiyention would be helpful
9 to the parties and wil enhance their ability to assist the Court in reaching a decision on the
10 motion through their briefing;
11 WHEREAS, counsel for Dilbeck Scott Kamber has stated to Netfix's counsel Ashok
12 Ramani and Blockbuster's counsel Willam O'Brien today that he does not oppose this request
13 for continuance of the hearing;
14 WHEREAS, no changes in the schedule of th