W02-SF:5BB\61456972.1
REPLY I/S/O MTN. TO COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSES TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P. CRAIG CARDON, Cal. Bar No. 168646
BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, Cal. Bar No. 196996
KENDALL M. BURTON, Cal. Bar No. 228720
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4106
Telephone:
415-434-9100
Facsimile:
415-434-3947
TIMOTHY H. KRATZ (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
LUKE ANDERSON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
MCGUIRE WOODS, L.L.P
1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2100
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: 404.443.5500
Facsimile: 404.443.5751
Attorneys for DIGITAL ENVOY, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
DIGITAL ENVOY, INC.,
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
v.
GOOGLE, INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant.
Case No. C 04 01497 RS
DIGITAL ENVOY'S REPLY BRIEF IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL
FURTHER RESPONSES TO DIGITAL
ENVOY'S REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS NOS. 3,
14, 18, 19, and 26
Date:
June 15, 2005
Time:
9:30 a.m.
Courtroom: 4, 5th Floor
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 191 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 1 of 2
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,
Doc. 191
Dockets.Justia.com
- 1 -
W02-SF:5BB\61456972.1
REPLY I/S/O MTN. TO COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSES TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Because Google has lodged the very same objections and arguments in opposition to both
of Digital Envoys Motions to Compel, Digital Envoy incorporates by reference the arguments set
forth in its Reply in Support of Digital Envoys Motion to Compel Further Responses to Its First
and Second Sets of Interrogatories and restates them here. Further, based on Googles
representations in its Opposition, Digital Envoy is willing to stay its request for i