1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION
NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation;
and AMERICA ONLINE, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an
Indiana corporation; ST. PAUL MERCURY
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota
corporation; EXECUTIVE RISK
SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; a
Connecticut corporation,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT)
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Complaint Filed: 12/12/05
Amended Complaint Filed: 2/24/06
The Court having held a Case Management Conference in this matter June 19,
2006, and the parties having met and conferred thereafter to agree upon dates consistent
with this Court’s Order, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
1.
Joinder of Parties: Any new parties shall be joined no later than June 30,
2006.
Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 45 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 3
Netscape Communications Corporation et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al
Doc. 45
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT)
2.
ADR. The parties shall be referred to mediation before a private mediator
after the conclusion of discovery and briefing in Phase One of the case.
3.
Initial Disclosures. The parties have been and shall continue to exchange
initial disclosures consistent with Phase One issues in the case.
4.
Phasing of Case.
This case shall proceed in Two Phases, as follows:
a.
Phase One shall include discovery and motion practice on whether
St. Paul had a duty to defend AOL and Netscape under its policy a