1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GOOGLE’S OPP’N TO KINDERSTART’S
RULE 11 MOTION
CASE NO. C 06-2057 JF (RS)
3014738_1.DOC
DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452
COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637
BART E. VOLKMER, State Bar No. 223732
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
DKramer@wsgr.com
JONATHAN M. JACOBSON
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
12 East 49th Street, 30th Floor
New York, NY 10017-8203
Telephone: (212) 999-5800
Facsimile: (212) 999-5899
JJacobson@wsgr.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Google Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
KINDERSTART.COM, LLC, a California
limited liability company, on behalf of itself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: C 06-2057 JF (RS)
DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S
OPPOSITION TO KINDERSTART’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
PURSUANT TO RULE 11
Before:
Hon. Jeremy Fogel
Date:
January 19, 2007
Time:
9:00 a.m.
Courtroom:
3, 5th Floor
Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 80 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 6
Kinderstart.Com, LLC v. Google, Inc.
Doc. 80
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GOOGLE’S OPP’N TO KINDERSTART’S
RULE 11 MOTION
CASE NO. C 06-2057 JF (RS)
-1-
3014738_1.DOC
I.
INTRODUCTION
In response to defendant Google Inc.’s (“Google”) Rule 11 motion for sanctions, plaintiff
KinderStart.com, LLC (“KinderStart”) hastily served and then filed its own sanctions motion
alleging that Google’s motion violated Rule 11. Because Google’s Rule 11 motion is
meritorious, KinderStart’s cross-motion necessarily fails. But e