COOLEY GODWARD
KRONISH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1024665 v1/SF
1.
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
C-07-0302 MJJ
COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP
STEPHEN C. NEAL (170085) (sneal@cooley.com)
JAMES DONATO (146140) (jdonato@cooley.com)
JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com)
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083) (jgutkin@cooley.com)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
Attorneys for Defendant
NVIDIA CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROY JACOBS, Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
NVIDIA CORPORATION; ATI
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; and ADVANCED
MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
Defendants.
Case No. C-07-0302 MJJ
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Plaintiff Roy Jacobs and Defendants Nvidia Corporation (“Nvidia”), ATI Technologies,
Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (collectively “AMD”) stipulate and agree as follows to
extend the time to respond to the complaint on file in this action (“Complaint”).
1.
On January 17, 2007, Plaintiff filed the Complaint, which alleges claims under
Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and under state antitrust and consumer protection
laws. Plaintiff has styled the Complaint as a putative class action.
2.
As of the date of this Stipulation, at least 23 other complaints have been filed in
this and other judicial districts. All of these complaints also allege federal and/or state law
antitrust claims against Nvidia and AMD and are styled as putative class actions.
Case 3:07-cv-00302-MJJ Document 5 Filed 01/25/2007 Page 1 of 4
AND ORDER
Case 3:07-cv-0302-WHA
t 9 Filed 02/05/207 Page 1 of 4
Jacobs v. Nvidia Corporation et al
Doc. 9
Dockets.Justia.com
COOLEY GODWARD
KRONISH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT