1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 This disposition is not designated for publication and may not be cited.
Case No. C 06-2057 JF (RS)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST UNDER LOCAL RULE 7-7 TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE
(JFEX2)
**E-Filed 6/26/06**
NOT FOR CITATION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
KINDERSTART.COM LLC, a California limited
liability company, on behalf of itself and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
Case Number C 06-2057 JF (RS)
ORDER1 DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST UNDER LOCAL RULE 7-7
TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S SPECIAL MOTION
TO STRIKE
[re: docket no. 31]
Plaintiff has filed an administrative request to continue the hearing on Defendant’s
special motion to strike pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code § 425.16 (“anti-SLAPP
motion”) to allow for discovery relating to Plaintiff’s defamation and libel claim. For the reasons
discussed below, Plaintiff’s request will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant’s filed its anti-SLAPP motion on May 2, 2006, asking this Court to strike three
claims from Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”): (1) Claim One, Violation of Right to
Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 35 Filed 06/26/2006 Page 1 of 4
Kinderstart.Com, LLC v. Google, Inc.
Doc. 35
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. C 06-2057 JF (RS)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST UNDER LOCAL RULE 7-7 TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE
(JFEX2)
Free Speech Under the United States Constitution and California Constitution, (2) Claim Eight,
Defamation and Libel, and (3) Claim Nine, Negligent Interference with Prospective Business
Advantage. The anti-SLAPP motion is scheduled to be heard June 30, 2006.
On