1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
DECLARATION of D. MOREHOUS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT VEOH NETWORKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
C 06-3926 (HRL)
THELEN REID
& PRIEST LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Dean A. Morehous (CA Bar No. 111841) dam@thelenreid.com
THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP
101 Second Street
Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 371-1200
Facsimile: (415) 371-1211
Michael S. Elkin (pro hac vice pending) melkin@thelenreid.com
Paul M. Fakler (pro hac vice pending) pfakler@thelenreid.com
THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP
875 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 603-2000
Facsimile: (212) 603-2001
Attorneys for Defendant
VEOH NETWORKS, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
IO GROUP, INC., a California Corporation
Plaintiff,
v.
VEOH NETWORKS, Inc., a California
Corporation,
Defendant.
Case No.: C06-3926 (HRL)
DECLARATION OF DEAN MOREHOUS
IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT VEOH NETWORKS, INC.
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
I, DEAN MOREHOUS, declare:
1.
I am a partner of the law firm of Thelen Reid & Priest LLP, attorneys of record for
Defendant VEOH Networks, Inc. (“Defendant”), in the above-entitled action. I am admitted to
practice in the State of California. The following matters are true of my own personal knowledge
and if called upon to do so, I could and would competently testify thereto.
2.
Plaintiff filed an Administrative Motion to Consolidate on September 11, 2006.
Based on that date, Plaintiff’s response to that motion is due Thursday, September 14, 2006.
Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 10 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.
Doc. 10
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1