1The term “party” as used in this Order means counsel for any party represented by a
lawyer and any pro se party not represented by a lawyer.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 06cv01605EWNBNB
UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., an Ohio corporation,
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING
This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland by Judge Edward W.
Nottingham, pursuant to the Order of Reference dated August 15, 2006. See 28 U.S.C.
§636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1) The court will hold a scheduling/planning conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)
September 26, 2006, at 9:30 a.m.
The conference will be held in Courtroom A401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States
Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient for any party1, that
party shall confer with opposing parties and contact my chambers to reschedule the conference to
a more convenient date. Please remember anyone entering the Alfred A. Arraj United States
Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR
Case 1:06-cv-01605-EWN-BNB Document 4 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 4
Maestas v. United Collection Bureau, Inc.
A copy of the instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form of
scheduling order can be downloaded from the court’s website at www.co.uscourts.gov/forms
frame.htm. (Click on “Civil Forms” in the blue box at the top of the screen and scroll down to the
bold hearing “Standardized Order Forms”). Parties shall prepare the proposed scheduling order in
accordance with the court’s form.
The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of Colorado
Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.L, including a copy of the proposed scheduling
order in a Word