1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECL. ISO GOOGLE’S SUPP. REPLY BRIEF
CASE NO.: C04-01497 RS
2743022_1.DOC
DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 (dkramer@wsgr.com)
DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952 (dlansky@wsgr.com)
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
Google Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
DIGITAL ENVOY, INC.,
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS
DECLARATION OF
DAVID L. LANSKY
IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.’S
SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF
Judge:
Hon. Richard Seeborg
Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 343 Filed 10/13/2005 Page 1 of 3
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,
Doc. 343
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
DECL. ISO GOOGLE’S SUPP. REPLY BRIEF
CASE NO.: C04-01497 RS
I, David L. Lansky, declare as follows:
1.
I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of California and
before this Court. I am associated with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (“WSGR”), counsel
for defendant and counterclaimant Google Inc. (“Google”). I have personal knowledge of the
facts set forth herein and, if called as a witness, could and would testify competently thereto.
2.
Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a chart I prepared noting
discrepancies between the assertions in Digital Envoy’s supplemental brief and the evidence
cited in support thereof.
3.
Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of excerpts from Digital Envoy’s
Supplemental and Amended Responses to Google’s Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 8-10 and
19).
4.
Attached as Exh