IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00630-DME-MEH
NETQUOTE INC, a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRANDON BYRD, an internet user making use of the IP Addresses 64.136.27.226 and
64.136.26.227, and
MOSTCHOICE.COM, INC., a Georgia corporation,
Defendants.
SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
TO SUBMIT EXPERT REPORTS
NetQuote, Inc. (“NetQuote”) respectfully moves for an extension of time to submit its
opening expert reports. In support of its motion, it states as follows:
1.
NetQuote seeks a ten-day extension of time for it to provide its expert disclosures
and for MostChoice to provide its rebuttal expert disclosures. NetQuote previously requested an
extension of time for 30 days after certain discovery was produced for it to provide its opening
expert disclosures. By order dated August 20, 2007, this Court granted the motion in part and
denied it in part, providing NetQuote until September 21, 2007 to provide its expert disclosures
and resetting other case deadlines.
2.
NetQuote seeks an additional 10-day extension, to and including October 1, 2007,
for it to provide its expert disclosures because its damages expert needs the additional time to
synthesize and analyze recently produced discovery, and otherwise to complete his analysis of
Case 1:07-cv-00630-DME-MEH Document 77 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 4
Netquote Inc. v. Byrd
Doc. 77
Dockets.Justia.com
2
the facts in this case. NetQuote’s damages expert has explained to undersigned counsel that his
analysis has been delayed, not only because of the recently produced discovery materials, but
also because of a deposition subpoena that he received in another matter. He has assured
undersigned counsel that the ten additional days requested will be sufficient for him to be able to
complete his analysis, subject only to any future supplements to his report based on additional
discovery produced in the case.
3.
Undersigned counsel contacted counsel for MostChoice about this request and
co