1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
This disposition is not designated for publication and may not be cited.
Case No. C 05-5102 JF
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(JFLC1)
NOT FOR CITATION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, a Delaware
Corporation, d/b/a SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US,
Plaintiff,
v.
MEHDI SHAHBAZI, et al.,
Defendants.
Case Number C 05-5102 JF
ORDER1 GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF
TIME
[re: docket no. 59]
Defendant Mehdi Shahbazi (“Shahbazi”), proceeding pro se, moves for an extension of
time to respond to Plaintiff Equilon Enterprises LLC’s (“Equilon”) motion for leave to file a first
amended complaint and motion for a preliminary injunction, both scheduled for hearing on
August 11, 2006. Equilon opposes the motion. The Court has considered this matter without
oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b).
Case 5:05-cv-05102-JF Document 62 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
Equilon Enterprises LLC v. Shahbazi et al
Doc. 62
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 Additionally, as Equilon requested, the Court clarifies that Shahbazi’s deadline to
respond is not depending on Equilon providing Shahbazi with any transcripts.
2
Case No. C 05-5102 JF
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(JFLC1)
Equilon’s additional evidence and arguments do not persuade the Court that Equilon
would suffer irreparable injury if the motions were continued for several weeks. Moreover, the
recent developments, including Shabazi’s continued protests, do not address this Court’s
previous determination serious questions on the merits remain as to whether provisions in both
the Marina RSA and the Marina lease were both reasonable and of material importance to the
franch