Comparison of the Diaton
Theodore H. Curtis, M.D.1, Douglas L Mackenzie,
M.D.1, Robert J. Noecker M.D.2, and Malik Y.
1The Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO
2Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,
• None of the authors have financial interests
relevant to the subject discussed.
• To compare intraocular pressure (IOP)
measurements obtained with Diaton trans-
palpebral tonometry versus Tonopen
applanation tonometry in children and adults.
• Goldmann applanation is the gold standard for IOP
• It has been supplanted by TonoPen applanation in many
settings because of it’s ease of use, portability,
convenience, and minimal training requirements.
• The TonoPen requires contact with the corneal surface,
and has the risks of iatrogenic corneal injury, spread of
pathogens, and requires topical anesthetics.
• The newly-developed Diaton tonometer is a
handheld device that measures pressure through
the tarsal plate (Figures 1 & 2).
• It avoids contact with the cornea and the need for
Figure 1: The Diaton
Figure 2: Using the
• We looked at 74 eyes of 38 consecutive patients who received both
Tonopen and Diaton tonometry
• TonoPen measurements were taken in the sitting position following
topical anesthesia with proparicaine.
• Diaton measurements were performed in the sitting position with the
patient gazing at a 45° angle, placing the eyelid margin at the
superior limbus. If necessary, gentle traction was placed on the brow
to align the lid with the limbus. The device was activated when the
signaling mechanism indicated the device was vertical.
• Age range 3-91 years of age (mean 47.5 years).
• The average IOP with the Diaton was 16.24 (+/-5.11 mm Hg; range
= 7-32 mmHg).
• The avera