UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
DOE I, and DOE II,
Individuals, whose true names are unknown,
Case No. 3:07CV00909(CFD)
DECLARATION OF STEVE MITRA IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO JOHN DOE 21’S MOTION TO QUASH
I, Steve Mitra, declare as follows:
I am duly licensed to practice law in the State of California and am an associate
with the law firm of Keker & Van Nest, LLP, counsel for plaintiffs Doe I and Doe II in the
above-captioned proceeding. I am admitted pro hac vice to appear before this Court in this
action. I have knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and if called to testify as a witness thereto,
could do so competently under oath.
On January 25, 2008, we posted notice on autoadmit.com, notifying defendants
that we filed a motion for expedited discovery, and providing an email address for contacting us.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of this post.
On or around February 1, 2008, we sent a subpoena to SBC Internet Services, Inc.
(now known as AT&T Internet Services (“AT&T”)) for information relating to the identity of the
1 The exhibits attached to this declaration have been redacted to replace Doe II’s name, in
accordance with this Court’s Order of June 18, 2007 granting Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed
Doe 1 et al v. Ciolli et al
person(s) assigned to the Internet Protocol (“IP”) address 188.8.131.52 on July 18, 2007 at 2:54
a.m. Eastern Time. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiffs’
Subpoena for the Production of Documents to SBC Internet Services, Inc. (now known as AT&T
Internet Services (“AT&T”)), dated February 1, 2008.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a fax I received from
AT&T, dated February 7, 2008, which memorialized the agreement reached bet