1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
—C-05-02579 RMW
DOH
E-FILED on
9/14/05
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CLICK DEFENSE, INC., a Colorado
corporation, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
No. C-05-02579 RMW
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS'
MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) DENYING
AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION
TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
[Re Docket No. 8, 14]
Click Defense, Inc. ("Click Defense") sued Google, Inc. ("Google") for (1) breach of contract, (2)
unfair business practices, (3) unjust enrichment, and (4) violation of California Business and Professions
Code §§ 17200, et seq. On July 27, 2005 Google moved to dismiss Click Defense's negligence and
unjust enrichment causes of action. Click Defense filed an opposition to Google's motion on August 19,
2005: one week after the deadline for filing an opposition had expired. Click Defense then filed a motion to
enlarge time to file its opposition. The court has read the parties' papers and considered their arguments.
For the reasons set forth below, the court (1) grants Google's motion to dismiss and (2) denies as moot
Click Defense's motion to enlarge time.
Case 5:05-cv-02579-RMW Document 18 Filed 09/14/2005 Page 1 of 3
Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
Doc. 18
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Click Defense's motion to enlarge time is thus moot.
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
—C-05-02579 RMW
DOH
2
Click Defense has agreed