1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a
)
2:04-cv-00809-GEB-PAN
Washington corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
ORDER
)
CALIFORNIA MICRO COMPUTERS, INC., )
a/k/a CA-MICRO a/k/a ADVANCED
)
CONCEPTS, a California corporation;)
and JAMES R. SCOTT, an individual, )
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
CALIFORNIA MICRO COMPUTERS, INC., )
a/k/a CA-MICRO a/k/a ADVANCED
)
CONCEPTS, a California corporation;)
and JAMES R. SCOTT, an individual, )
)
Defendants and
)
Third Party Plaintiffs, )
)
v.
)
)
GLOBAL TRADING INTERNATIONAL,
)
INC., COMPWAVES,
)
)
Third Party Defendants. )
)
On July 21, 2005, a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice
and a Proposed Order were filed, in which the stipulating parties
erroneously assume the federal court will retain jurisdiction to
enforce a “Settlement Agreement and Release between Microsoft and
Case 2:04-cv-00809-GEB-PAN Document 31 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 1 of 2
Microsoft Corp v. CA Micro Computers, et al
Doc. 31
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Defendants” which the undersigned judge has not seen. However,
Defendants are dismissed from Microsoft’s Complaint with prejudice as
the parties requested in the July 21 Stipulation, and the Court
retains jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ “Stipulated Permanent
Injunction” which was filed July 21, 2005, and executed by the
undersigned Judge on September 28, 2005.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 28, 2005
/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
Case 2:04-cv-00809-GEB-PAN Document 31 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 2 of 2