Trying to Meet Building Compliance? - Photoluminescent Exit Signs Will Help You Meet Your Building Codes
When mid-sized and large-scale businesses are faced with the sizable list of OSHA and Fire Code regulations, it can seem both expensive and
daunting. Code changes have a grave financial consequence. The expense of replacing large numbers of out-of-date fire exit signs can put a huge
dent into any budget. Smart managers owe it to themselves to weigh all of the opportunities for cost-effective exit sign compliance. Purchasing
photoluminescent exit signs can open the door to safety savings.
The government itself has quit using electric and tritium exit signs in its buildings. Endorsed by the Federal Energy Management Program as the
greater option, photoluminescent products are being positioned in federal properties all over the United States.
Here are three cost-cutting reasons to review photoluminescent improvements for your business:
1. Installation Expense: Unlike electric exit signs, photoluminescent exit signs require little skill to put in place. Many are prepackaged with mounting
hardware. Best of all, it requires zero electrical work at all.
2. Operation Expenses: operating 100 incandescent exit signs eat up $3,500 each year in energy costs. Replacing electric signs conserves the money
in your budget, to be better used in other areas of operation. Maintenance costs fall decidedly as well. Replacing bulbs are a thing of the past. There
are no wire shorts or electrical faults to worry about. Photoluminescent products are simply maintained for more than 25 years with little to no stress or
3. Expense of Disposal: A good number of businesses already have a radioactive form of self-luminous exit signs known as tritium signage. Although
they save costs in operation, these signs call for extremely cautious removal should any damage occur to the sign itself. Disposal of tritium exit signs
can encompass hazardous material removal at the business owner's expense.
Cost is not measured in dollars solely. Co