1
Alberta SCI Action Strategy Stakeholders’ Forum, March 6, 2010
Participant Evaluation - RESULTS
n=18 (approximately 50% response rate – number of total participants fluctuated
throughout the day)).
1. Did the Forum meet your expectations? (circle)
Yes, definitely
Yes, somewhat
No, not really
No, not at all
(10)
(8)
Comments:
- More participation from stakeholders would have been beneficial.
-
just a bit too much to digest/process in one day.
- well organized, good venue for open discussion. Time effective.
- Did not address ALL Albertans
- more time for discussion/networking
- well organized – agenda good!
- expanded the thoughts in the initial(?) doc.
2. How would you rate the facilitation by Rethink?
Excellent
Good
Excellent/Good
Fair
Poor
(8)
(8)
(1)
(1)
Comments:
- always good
3. How would you rate the process that was used (ie. presentation followed by small
group discussion and workbooks)?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
No rating
(6)
(10)
(1)
(1)
Comments:
- worked well – generated valuable discussion
- seemed that there was no room for changes because the Delphi findings were
considered as final.
- Time was a bit of a challenge (but also helped limit the discussion).
- Not enough time for discussions in AM
2
4. How would you rate the facilitation at your table?
Excellent
Good Excellent/Good
Fair
Poor n/a (was one)
(8)
(7)
(1)
(1)
(1)
Comments:
- very defensive
- excellent input from stakeholders
5. How would you rate the venue (location, parking, food, accessibility, etc.)?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
No rating
(9)
(8)
(1)
Comments:
-
far from downtown?
- knives/forks/spoons look great but difficult to balance/handle
- A bit on the cool (cold) side.
- could have been smaller and more intimate
6. What did you li