Natural Resources Conservation Service
Application Ranking Summary
Carbon County - Grazingland Health
Program:
Ranking Date:
Application Number:
Ranking Tool: Carbon County - Grazingland Health
Applicant:
Final Ranking Score:
Address:
Planner:
Telephone:
Farm Location:
National Priorities Addressed
Issue Questions
Responses
1. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in considerable reductions of non-point source
pollution, such as nutrients, sediment, pesticides, excess salinity in impaired watersheds consistent with
TMDL's where available as well as the reduction of groundwater contamination or point source such as
contamination from confined animal feeding operations?
Yes o or No o
2. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in the conservation of a considerable amount of
ground or surface water resources?
Yes o or No o
3. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in a considerable reduction of emissions, such
as particulate matter, nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds, and ozone precursors and depleters
that contribute to air quality impairment violations of National Ambient Air Quality Standards?
Yes o or No o
4. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in a considerable reduction in soil erosion and
sedimentation from unacceptable levels on agricultural land?
Yes o or No o
5. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in a considerable increase in the promotion of
at-risk species habitat conservation?
Yes o or No o
State Issues Addressed
Issue Questions
Responses
1. GRAZINGLAND MANAGEMENT - This resource concern will be directly benefited as determined by the
goals identified by the landowner through the EQIP application process and reflected by the components to be
included in the EQIP application (you may select more than one).
Yes o or No o
2. WATER QUALITY CONCERNS RELATED TO ANIMAL WASTE - This resource concern will be
directly benefited as determined by the goals identified by the landowner th