[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE
INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
CASE NO. 05-03649
[41063-0023/BY062750.058]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577
JUDITH B. GITTERMAN, Bar No. 115661
M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463
PERKINS COIE LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: (415) 344-7000
Facsimile: (415) 344-7050
Email: DBiderman@perkinscoie.com
Email: JGitterman@perkinscoie.com
Email: CJhang@perkinscoie.com
Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a
INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD
STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE, INC.,
Defendant.
CASE NO. C O5-03649 JW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
GOOGLE INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
Date:
November 6, 2006
Time:
9:00 a.m.
Place:
Courtroom 8
Judge:
Honorable James Ware
Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 86 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc.
Doc. 86
Dockets.Justia.com
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE
INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
CASE NO. 05-03649
[41063-0023/BY062750.058]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, for
Summary Adjudication, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), having come
on for hearing, the Court having considered all relevant documents and evidence and having
considered the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor:
IT IS HE