[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Case No. C 06-7754 SBA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Deborah Bailey-Wells
(114630, deborah.bailey-wells@klgates.com)
Kevin C. Trock
(161787, kevin.trock@klgates.com)
Harold H. Davis, Jr.
(235552, harold.davis@klgates.com)
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP
55 Second St., Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone (415) 882-8200
Fax:
(415) 882-8220
Attorneys for Plaintiff HELIO LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
HELIO, LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
PALM INC.
Defendant.
Case No. C 06-7754 SBA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
HELIO’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
Case 4:06-cv-07754-SBA Document 42 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 4
Helio LLC v. Palm, Inc.
Doc. 42
Dockets.Justia.com
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Case No. C 06-7754 SBA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF HELIO’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
This cause has been presented to the Court, upon motion of Plaintiff Helio LLC
(“Helio”), seeking a Preliminary Injunction during the pendency of this action, from infringing
Helio’s trademarks pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 65 and Civ. L.R. 65-1.
Helio’s motion is supported by a Memorandum of Points and Authorities; the
Declaration of Harold H. Davis; and the Declaration of Kathryn Wheble.
This Court having given full consideration to all of the parties’ papers and the relevant
authorities and argument of counsel, and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 65 and Civ. L.R. 65-1, makes the following Order:
1.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. § 1021, § 1051 et
seq. and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
2.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant Palm Inc. by virtue of its
having its principal place of busi