United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of CaliforniaIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TOMMY DUNBAR
Plaintiff,
v.
LUCASZ GOTTWALD
Defendant.
/
NO. CV 07-02758 WDB
CLERK’S NOTICE RE: FAILURE
TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY
DOCKET NO. 5 AND/OR
REGISTER AS AN E-FILER.
On July 18, 2007, counsel for Defendant Apple Inc. filed a Stipulation To Extend Time to Answer,
docket #5, manually, on paper. This case has been designated for electronic filing, pursuant to Local
Rule 5-4 and General Order 45.
The above mentioned paper document has been filed and docketed. However, General Order 45
provides at Section III that cases assigned to judges who participate in the e-filing program “shall be
presumptively designated” as e-filing cases. Therefore, counsel for Defendant Apple Inc. should
submit the Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer, docket #5, in PDF format within 10 days, as an
attachment in an e-mail message directed to the judges chamber's "PDF" email box listed at
http://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. (Click on the Judges button and follow the procedure listed there). Do not
e-file a document which has been previously filed on paper, as is the case with the above mentioned
filing. All subsequent papers should be e-filed.
Case 4:07-cv-02758-WDB Document 6 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dunbar et al v. Gottwald et al
Doc. 6
Dockets.Justia.com
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Further, General Order 45 provides at Section IV (A) that "Each attorney of record is obligated to
become an ECF User and be assigned a user ID and password for access to the system upon designation
of the action as being subject to ECF." Counsel in this case who have not