United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances
underlying the present motion.
ORDER, page 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
In re
Application of
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Applicant.
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 06-80038 JF (PVT)
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR ORDER ALLOWING
DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
§ 1782; AND
SETTING DEADLINES FOR OBJECTIONS
AND MOTIONS TO QUASH
On March 3, 2006, Applicant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) filed an Application for
Order Allowing Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782.1 Based on the brief presented,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Microsoft’s motion is GRANTED; Microsoft is authorized
to serve the forms of subpoena attached to its Application (the “Subpoenas”), however, the form of
each subpoena must be revised to include the name, address, phone number, and fax number of the
attorney who issues the subpoena. The form of each subpoena shall also be revised to state the date,
time and place for the subpoenaed deposition and for the document production. Microsoft shall
provide notice of no less than 10 days for the depositions and document productions. Microsoft may
set the dates and times for deposition without first consulting the deponent, but concurrently with
Case 5:06-mc-80038-JF Document 6 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 1 of 2
Microsoft Corporation v. Ronald Alepin Morrison & Foerster et al
Doc. 6
Dockets.Justia.com
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER, page 2
service of the subpoenas Microsoft shall offer to confer regarding the deponent’s scheduling needs
and the possibility of adjusting the date and/or time for the deposition if necessary. A copy of this
order shall be served with ea