IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Phillip S. Figa
Civil Action No. 06cv00410PSFMEH
ATV SOLUTIONS, INC., a Nevada corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
R.A.M.P.S., INC., an Arkansas corporation, d/b/a Medramps and Allramps;
JEFF HILL, an individual; and
BAGE COMPANY, a Florida corporation,
Defendants.
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to F.R.CIV.P. 16 and
D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 for the setting of a pretrial scheduling conference. IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall appear on May 1, 2006 at 8:30 a.m., in
Courtroom A602 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Sixth Floor, of the
Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall confer and prepare a Proposed Joint
Scheduling Order that is due to the Court at least five days before the Scheduling
Conference. Counsel shall comply with the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling
Order (see Appendix F of the Local Rules of Practice in the United States District Court
for the District of Colorado). Copies of the Local Rules are available under the “Local
Rules” button at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov and from the Clerk of the Court. Because
one of the claims asserts patent infringement, the parties are directed to determine to
Case 1:06-cv-00410-PSF Document 2 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
ATV Solutions, Inc. v. R.A.M.P.S., Inc. et al
Doc. 2
Dockets.Justia.com
2
what extent, if possible, the terms and deadlines set forth in the Local Rules of Practice
for Patent Cases before the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California could apply and be helpful to this case. These Rules may be found at
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/LocalRul.nsf by clicking on “Patent Local Rules”
under “All Local Rules.” The parties, through counsel, shall prepare the Proposed Joint
Scheduling Order accordingly with whatever stipulations they deem appropriate using
those local rules