1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
on
11
~
12
.~
$- .. in
o go
13
S ;:~
.. ,0
ö ~ ~
. ",,,co
14
'" '
~ ~O\ ~
.. .. c: '"
.. a:uO\
15
Q) -t~~
~ ~.~
"" ..
16
0
$-
U
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION
PAUL HOLMAN and LUCY RIVELLO,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
) Case No. 07-CV-05152-JW
)
)
) (PROPOSED) ORDER GRATING
) DEFENDANTS MOTION TO
) ENLARGE TIME TO ANSWER OR
) OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
) PLAITIFFS COMPLAINT
)
)
) Date: Not Scheduled
) Time Not Scheduled
) Judge: Honorable James Ware
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE, INC., AT&T MOBILITY LLC, and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive.
Defendants
Ths matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Enlarge Time to Answer or
Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint ("Motion to Enlarge Time"). Defendants seek
additional time to answer, or otherwise respond, to plaintiffs' complaint because there is another
action pending that raises similar issues of law and fact. The Court finds it would save time and
costs related to litigation to align the two briefing schedules of the two matters.
The Court hereby GRANTS defendants Motion to Enlarge Time. Defendants may
move, answer, or otherwise respond to plaintiffs' complaint, which was filed in ths Court on
1
(PROPOSED) ORDER GRATING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO PLAITIFFS COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 07-CV-05152-JW
Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 32 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 5
Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
Doc. 32
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
on
11
~
12
.~
$- .. in
o go
13
S ;:~
.. ,0
.. "" 0
0'" ""
. N\ØC? 14
- '" ""
~ ~O\\C
.. .. c: '"
.. a:uO\
15
OJ 7:~~
~ ~.~
"" ..
16
0
$-
U
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
October 5, 2007, on or before December 21, 2007. If Defendants respond through motion,
plaintiffs' opposition to the motion shall be fied on Januar 31,2008, defendants' reply brief(s)
shall be filed on February 11, 2008, and any such motions shall be set for hearng on Febr