1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
CASE NO. C 06-2057 JF (RS)
3080486_2.DOC
DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
DKramer@wsgr.com
JONATHAN M. JACOBSON
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
12 East 49th Street, 30th Floor
New York, NY 10017-8203
Telephone: (212) 999-5800
Facsimile: (212) 999-5899
JJacobson@wsgr.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Google Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
KINDERSTART.COM, LLC, a California
limited liability company, on behalf of itself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: C 06-2057 JF (RS)
DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
PURSUANT TO COURT’S MARCH 16,
2007 ORDER
Before:
Hon. Jeremy Fogel
Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 93 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 5
Kinderstart.Com, LLC v. Google, Inc.
Doc. 93
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
CASE NO. C 06-2057 JF (RS)
-1-
3080486_2.DOC
INTRODUCTION
On March 16, 2007, this Court granted, in part, Google Inc.’s (“Google”) Motion for
Sanctions against Kinderstart.com (“KinderStart”) and Gregory Yu pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 11 (the “Motion”). In relevant part, Google’s Motion challenged KinderStart’s
allegations in its Second Amended Complaint that (a) Google skews it search results and reserves
top placement for entities that compensate Google; and (b) Google removes certain websites from
its search results and lowers PageRanks