1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GOOGLE’S STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION
TO DIGITAL ENVOY’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
AMEND COMPLAINT
C 04 01497 RS
C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\PBM\2530605_1.DOC
DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452
STEPHEN C. HOLMES, State Bar No. 200727
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
Google Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
DIGITAL ENVOY, INC.,
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS
GOOGLE INC.’S STATEMENT OF
NONOPPOSITION TO DIGITAL
ENVOY’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND
RELIEF FROM CASE
MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Judge:
Hon. Richard Seeborg
Courtroom: 4, 5th Floor
Date:
October 6, 2004
Time:
9:30 a.m.
)
Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 43 Filed 09/15/2004 Page 1 of 2
Digital Envoy Inc., v. Google Inc.,
Doc. 43
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GOOGLE’S STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION
TO DIGITAL ENVOY’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
AMEND COMPLAINT
C 04 01497 RS
2
C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\PBM\2530605_1.DOC
Google Inc. (“Google”) responds, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(b), that it does not oppose
Digital Envoy’s motion for leave to amend the complaint. In so doing, Google notes its strong
disagreement with the factual and legal contentions set forth in Digital Envoy’s motion for leave
to amend and supporting papers. Google’s decision not to oppose Digital Envoy’s motion for
leave to amend is not, and should be construed as, an admission that the proposed amended
complaint states a claim for which relief may be granted, states a valid cause of action or
otherw