The motion for temporary restraining order is a part of plaintiff’s Motion For Temporary
Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction [#2] filed November 22, 2006.
Thus, this written order is issued to confirm, supplement, and expatiate the findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and temporary orders entered from the bench in open court after hearing on
December 6, 2006.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 06-cv-02346-REB-MJW
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
On December 6, 2006, I heard the plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining
order [#2], filed November 22, 2006. The parties have completed briefing on the
motion, and both the plaintiff and the defendant presented evidence and argument at
the hearing. At the conclusion of the December 6, 2006, hearing I issued a detailed
oral ruling from the bench, and I granted the plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining
order. For the sake of a clear record, I issue this written order, which summarizes my
I have federal question jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s Fair Housing Act claim
under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. I have supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law
claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
Case 1:06-cv-02346-REB-GJR Document 18 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 3
Alarcon v. Partch
In determining whether a temporary restraining order should issue, I have
judicially noticed all relevant adjudicative facts in the file and record pro tanto; I have
considered the evidence adduced at the hearing; and I have considered the reasons
stated, arguments advanced, and authorities cited by the parties in their papers and
during their oral argument. I incorporate in this order my findings of fact, conclusions of
law, and orders, as stated in my oral ruling from the bench on December 6, 2006.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the plaintiff’s motion for temp