-1-
SPERLEIN DECLARATION
IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION
C-06-3926 (HRL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GILL SPERLEIN (172887)
THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN
584 Castro Street, Suite 849
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 487-1211 X32
Facsimile: (415) 252-7747
legal@titanmedia.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
IO GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
VEOH NETWORKS, Inc, a California
Corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C-06-3926 (HRL)
DECLARATION OF GILL SPERLEIN IN
SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF RELATED
CASES; AND TO RESET DATES
RELATING TO CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE.
I, GILL SPERLEIN, declare:
1.
I am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of California and attorney of
record for Plaintiff Io Group, Inc.
2.
On behalf of Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. I filed in the Northern District of California
actions against Veoh Networks, Inc. on June 23, 2006 (C-06-3926 (HRL)); against Data
Conversions, Inc. on August 23, 2006 (C-06-5162 (HRL)); and against Webnovas Technologies,
Inc., and Gonetmarket, Inc., a Nevada Corporation on August 30, 2006 (C-06-5334 (JSW).
Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 20 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 5
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.
Doc. 20
Dockets.Justia.com
-2-
SPERLEIN DECLARATION
IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION
C-06-3926 (HRL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.
On September 11, 2006 I filed a Notice of Related Cases in the form of a Motion
for Administrative Relief seeking to relate these three cases.
4.
On September 12, 2006, parties stipulated to extend to September 25, 2006, the
deadline for Veoh Networks to answer or otherwise respond to Io Group, Inc.’s