United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CS/DORFMAN OPERATING COMPANY
INC.,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
LEE DORFMAN, INDIVIDUALLY and D/B/A
ADEPT OF SAN FRANCISCO,
Defendant(s).
/
No. C 05-4025 MEJ
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE
CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Request for Leave to File a Motion to Reconsider,
filed on October 3, 2005. Upon review of the record in this action, the Court notes that the parties
have not filed written consents to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction or requests for reassignment
to a United States District Court judge for trial. This civil case was randomly assigned to United
States Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James for all purposes including trial. In accordance with Title
28, U.S.C. § 636(c), the Magistrate Judges of this District Court are designated to conduct any and
all proceedings in a civil case, including a jury or non-jury trial, and to order the entry of final
judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Magistrate Judge
James may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same
manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
Case 3:05-cv-04025-MEJ Document 4 Filed 10/18/2005 Page 1 of 2
CS/Dorfman Operating Company Inc. v. Dorfman
Doc. 4
Dockets.Justia.com
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and
disposition. Accordingly, the parties shall inform the Court whether they consent to Magistrate
Judge James’ jurisdiction or request reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. A copy
of both