1
APPLE INC.’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF EXTENDING PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Case No. C 06-5805 SBA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
David J. Miclean (#115098/miclean@fr.com)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, California 94063
Telephone: (650) 839-5070
Facsimile: (650) 839-5071
Lisa M. Martens (#195824/martens@fr.com)
Andrew M. Abrams (#229698/abrams@fr.com)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
12390 El Camino Real
San Diego, California 92130
Telephone: (858) 678-5070
Facsimile: (858) 678-5099
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim Defendant
APPLE INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(OAKLAND DIVISION)
APPLE INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
PODFITNESS, INC., and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. C 06-5805 SBA
APPLE INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
EXTENDING PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
PODFITNESS, INC.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff
v.
APPLE INC.,
Counterclaim Defendant
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc.
Doc. 85
Dockets.Justia.com
2
APPLE INC.’ S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’ S MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF EXTENDING PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Case No. C 06-5805 SBA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”)
hereby submits its Opposition to Defendant’ s Motion for Administrative Relief Extending Pretrial
Deadlines. Podfitness, Inc.’ s (“Podfitness” or “Defendant”) failure to conduct adequate discovery
does not merit an extension of pretrial deadlines in this already prolonged litigation.
Furthermore, Podfitness’ refusal to comply with Apple’ s longstanding deposition notices should
not be rewarded by granting it