-1-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
C-06-3926 (HRL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GILL SPERLEIN (172887)
THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN
584 Castro Street, Suite 849
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 487-1211 X32
Facsimile: (415) 252-7747
legal@titanmedia.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
IO GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
VEOH NETWORKS, Inc, a California
Corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C-06-3926 (HRL)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR FURTHER EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE
OF RELATED CASES; AND TO RESET
DATES RELATING TO CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. and Defendant Veoh Network,
Inc., hereby stipulate that the Court will refrain from ruling as to whether or not Io Group, Inc. v.
Veoh, Networks, Inc., C-06-3926 (HRL), Io Group, Inc. v. Data Conversions, Inc, C-06-065162
(HRL), and Io Group, Inc. v. Webnovas Technologies, Inc. and Gonetmarket, Inc, C-06-5334
(JSW) are related until after October 19, 2006 when the defendants in the other actions have had
sufficient opportunity to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition.
This stipulation will effect the date of the Case Management Conference and related
deadlines, taking them off calendar until the Court has made its ruling as to whether or not the
case are related.
Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 19 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 6
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.
Doc. 19
Dockets.Justia.com
-2-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
C-06-3926 (HRL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The extension of time is necessary to ensure that defendants have an opportunity to be
heard on the issue relatedness and to ensure the efficient us