COOLEY GODWARD
KRONISH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
739715 v1/PA
1.
STANFORD’S STATEMENT OF ISSUES FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP
STEPHEN C. NEAL (No. 170085) (nealsc@cooley.com)
RICARDO RODRIGUEZ (No. 173003) (rr@cooley.com)
MICHELLE S. RHYU (No. 212922) (mrhyu@cooley.com)
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Tel:
(650) 843-5000
Fax:
(650) 857-0663
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD
JUNIOR UNIVERSITY and Counterclaim Defendant THOMAS
MERIGAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
UNIVERSITY,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, ET AL.,
Defendants.
Case No. C 05 04158 MHP
STANFORD UNIVERSITY’S STATEMENT
OF ISSUES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, ET AL.,
Counterclaimants,
v.
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
UNIVERSITY; AND THOMAS MERIGAN,
Counterclaim Defendants.
Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 77 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al
Doc. 77
Dockets.Justia.com
COOLEY GODWARD
KRONISH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
739715 v1/PA
2.
STANFORD’S STATEMENT OF ISSUES FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Court’s September 22, 2006 Order, Plaintiff Stanford University identifies
the following topics on which it intends to move for summary judgment:
1.
All of Roche’s claims to ownership and license of the patents and patent applications
identified in their counterclaims are barred by the statute of limitations, estoppel, laches,
unenforceability and lack of standing.
2.
There is insufficient evidence as a matter o