1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAI-2843381v1
DEFENDANTS’ EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
CV 06-3718 JW HRLX
Maria K. Nelson (State Bar No. 155, 608)
mknelson@jonesday.com
Anna E. Raimer (State Bar No. 234, 794)
aeraimer@jonesday.com
Antionette D. Dozier (State Bar No. 244, 437)
adozier@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
555 South Flower Street
Fiftieth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300
Telephone:
(213) 489-3939
Facsimile:
(213) 243-2539
Attorneys for Defendants
SEÁN SWEENEY AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES
JOYCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CAROL LOEB SHLOSS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SEÁN SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee
of the Estate of James Joyce, and THE
ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE,
Defendants.
Case No. CV 06-3718 JW HRLx
SUBSTITUTE EVIDENTIARY
OBJECTIONS TO THE
DECLARATION OF CAROL LOEB
SHLOSS, THE DECLARATION OF
DAVID S. OLSON, EXHIBITS A, P, R
AND T TO THE DECLARATION OF
CAROL LOEB SHLOSS, AND
EXHIBITS 2, 3, 4 AND 5 TO THE
DECLARATION OF ROBERT SPOO
Date:
January 31, 2007
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: The Honorable James Ware
Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Document 51 Filed 01/23/2007 Page 1 of 8
Shloss v. Sweeney et al
Doc. 51
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAI-2843381v1
1
DEFENDANTS’ EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
CV 06-3718 JW HRLX
Defendants Seán Sweeney and the Estate of James Joyce (“Defendants”) submit their
Substitute Evidentiary Objections in place of the Objections and Motion to Strike filed on January
8, 2007.1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-5, Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
Rules 401, 402, 403, 408, 602, and 802 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Defendants hereby
object to portions of the Declaration of Carol Loeb Shloss (“Shloss”) filed in Support of
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Shloss Declaration”), portions of the
Declaration of Da