1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
51175/2074603.1
-1-
Case No. C 06 7754 SBA
[PROPOSED] ORDER
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP
Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)
Brian Cannon (Bar No. 193071)
Doug Colt (Bar No. 210915)
Andrea Pallios Roberts (Bar No. 228128)
claudestern@quinnemanuel.com
briancannon@quinnemanuel.com
dougcolt@quinnemanuel.com
andreaproberts@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone:
(650) 801-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 801-5100
Attorneys for Defendant Palm, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
HELIO LLC
Plaintiff,
vs.
PALM, INC.
Defendant.
CASE NO. C 06 7754 SBA
__________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR TERMS
AND CONDITIONS IN CONNECTION
WITH DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1.
On March 21, 2007, plaintiff Helio filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss its claims
with prejudice.
2.
On March 29, 2007, defendant Palm filed a request for terms and conditions in
connection with dismissal without prejudice or, in the alternative, request for dismissal with
prejudice.
3.
The Court heard oral argument on plaintiff's motion on April 10, 2007.
4.
Having considered the papers and evidence in support of and in opposition to
plaintiff's motion, the papers and evidence in support of and in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for
Case 4:06-cv-07754-SBA Document 84 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 4
Helio LLC v. Palm, Inc.
Doc. 84
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
51175/2074603.1
-2-
Case No. C 06 7754 SBA
[PROPOSED] ORDER
a preliminary injunction, the relevant authorities, and the respective arguments of counsel, the
Court denies plaintiff's motion and now rules as follows:
5.
There is no evidence that plaintiff’s “Don’t call it a phone” and “Don’t call us a
phone company” marks have secondary meani