-1-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
C-06-3926 (HRL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GILL SPERLEIN (172887)
THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN
584 Castro Street, Suite 849
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 487-1211 X32
Facsimile: (415) 252-7747
legal@titanmedia.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
IO GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
VEOH NETWORKS, Inc, a California
Corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C-06-3926 (HRL)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY
CUT-OFF DATES
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. and Defendant Veoh Networks,
Inc., hereby stipulate to extend certain discovery cutoff dates.
Plaintiff requested that Defendant stipulate to an extension of time because Plaintiff
believes that it needs additional discovery and that the current discovery schedule does not allow
enough time. Defendant has agreed to a thirty-day extension of currently scheduled deadlines as
set forth below.
Although this case was originally filed on June 6, 2006, there was a dormant period during
which the Court considered Plaintiff’s Motion to Relate the matter to two later-filed cases. Upon
Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 64 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 1 of 4
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.
Doc. 64
Dockets.Justia.com
-2-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
C-06-3926 (HRL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ordering the matters related, the Court significantly postponed the initial case management
conference in order that it be held in conjunction with the later-filed, related cases.
Previously, stipulations and orders resulted in the following time modifications.
On August 10, 2006 the parties stipulated and the Court ordered that Defendant have until
September 25, 2006 to