A L I : 7ul 1"fFi7 LIABILITY PokFJN9JUHP
p, rrO rri E:-s ar iuWI
THE Nl A,TiSIIV.̀: IB IJ I L,C>,NG
STEF- NEIJ C] . , AIaCuN!5wY"
114 E '_^ S I PPNt t F7E LEON Av, E r JilrE FIRM IE'MA!!, /1CI fl' R E S :7 :
D Jtiw} A . Eksj 1dF iN "i
HHi 3igMf~N1~i~ A•L,AYf .i =CAM
Dc~ : n TiJFr . GE V~;c~ ~k 3~0~63i7
Sin: 'px ..riiF. L . i' E ltqx
TE[LCP0+.iO rol: : ( 40 .4 7' 37 7 ..J11 9 1
_----- - ...--- . . F.~c S~r•n i ,e :
(4q •4 7
: 3 7-,r+3!3'S 3Ei
. . .a w..~, . .r~ .. r~
VVMMf. [A-LJ kW _ C A M
Ju iiE : 27, 20'0.5
Rebecw A. Hall, Cr iE :tira ric e~ C,ou n :s+al
;~t:at~s Bar of Georgia Office of the C~s~rne~ra f t;~cru in;yel
'i(14 Ma rie t ha, Street, Pd .VV ,
»,r i tE' 1 DO
Atlanta, GA 30303.
RE: 1Gnievanae against John C . Joyner
Bar No. 405550
Dear Aft. M ,aff :
J represent W . Stegeinan in l e4ja l matters, not related to Mr. Joyner, however, he has shared ; your
letter af February 2, 2005, a copy of which is enriiose%d, and, on behalf of Mr. Stegeman, we ;aslc that you
rt:-ex ,avr iin&. this matter. My request is made for infuti rn.34icrr ra l purp)ses and not as Mr . :ilegenrat7 's
counsel concerning thfs matter .
In paiit iicul eir there were certain iteimi s; Wfh-.41 and approve:41 ; htnue+rer •, ftie b if -Is. could riot have been
incurred given wh e re Ms. Caffrey was IlYlnlg
i . ("See : pIo4nt1) and J'oynar's response, cx0pi i :, of which are
enclosed.) The mere fact that Mr. :itegeman did not object does not waive at claim of fraudulent b i l Fr ng .
Please Understand that I have never met P4r. joyner and other than a few telephone cal l s
regarding probate di.SpiJ1;es, I have never dealt with him proib5sionally. However, some! of ithe poi nts
na ;i sed by Mr, : Ste c~e srn;a ~n warrant lurlher investigation investigation by the ~~tats : Bar.
Thank. you in ail van(x- for your attenti on to this rnatter_
Sincerely, , , ~?
S tephen 13, Apolinslof, Esquire
c :c : James Stegemanll/
John C. Joyner, Esq .
Case 1:06-cv-02954-WSD Document 1 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 1