United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances
underlying the present motion.
2
The Standing Order for Civil Practice in Cases Assigned for All Purposes to Magistrate
Judge Patricia V. Trumbull (rev. 4/25/03) requires that, within two weeks after any party files a
dispositive motion, all parties who have not already done so must file either a consent to Magistrate
Judge jurisdiction or else a requests for reassignment to a District Court Judge.
ORDER, page 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
ROBERT A. BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 05-1779 PVT
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON
MOTION TO DISMISS; AND SETTING
DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A
MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OR ELSE A
DECLINATION TO AND REQUEST FOR
REASSIGNMENT
On May 6, 2005, Defendants Google, Inc. and Marissa Mayer (“Defendants”) filed a motion
to dismiss.1 Pursuant to this court’s standing order each party was thus required to file either a
consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, or else a request for reassignment, no later than May 20,
2005.2 To date, no party has complied. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than June 15, 2005, all parties shall file either a
Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, or else a Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate
Judge and Request for Reassignment. Both forms are available from the clerk of the court, or from
Case 5:05-cv-01779-RMW Document 22 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 1 of 2
Brown v. Google, Inc. et al
Doc. 22
Dockets.Justia.com
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER, page 2
the “forms” section of the court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov).