United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME
C 03-5340 JF (RS)
1
*E-FILED 7/17/06*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
GOOGLE INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY,
INC.,
Defendant.
/
NO. C 03-5340 JF (RS)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
ORDER SHORTENING TIME
Before the Court is defendant’s motion for an order shortening time filed July 13, 2006. The
request for shortened time is premised on the mistaken notion that the pending discovery cut off will
render the underlying motion moot if it is not heard before that cut off. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule
26-2, motions to compel as to outstanding discovery requests are timely if filed up to seven days
after the discovery cut off. The passing of the discovery cut off does not preclude the completion of
any discovery that may be ordered as the result of the Court granting a motion to compel that has
been timely filed under that rule. Given that the Court recently denied a similar request for
shortened time filed by plaintiff for this same reason, defendant’s motion for an order shortening
time is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 7/17/06
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 150 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
Doc. 150
Dockets.Justia.com
United States District CourtFor the Northern District of California1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME
C 03-5340 JF (RS)
2
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN GIVEN TO:
Ethan B. Andelman andelmane@howrey.com, cranmerp@howrey.com
Dawn Beery dbeery@kelley