-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C-06-3926 (HRL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GILL SPERLEIN (172887)
THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN
584 Castro Street, Suite 849
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 487-1211 X32
Facsimile: (415) 252-7747
legal@titanmedia.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
IO GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
VEOH NETWORKS, Inc, a California
Corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C-06-3926 (HRL)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND CERTAIN
DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATES
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. and Defendant Veoh Network,
Inc., hereby stipulate to extend certain discovery cutoff dates.
The extension of time is necessary in order to schedule three depositions that the parties
were unable to schedule prior to the May 30, 2007 cut-off date in spite of their best efforts to do
so. Parties merely seek to extend discovery for the limited purpose of plaintiff’s third party
depositions of John “Halcyon” Styn, Shelter Capital, LLC and Tornante, LCC. All depositions
will be complete by June 7, 2007.
Previously, stipulations and orders resulted in the following time modifications.
Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 71 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.
Doc. 71
Dockets.Justia.com
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C-06-3926 (HRL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On August 10, 2006 the parties stipulated and the Court ordered that Defendant have until
September 25, 2006 to file a pleading responsive to the Complaint and that the initial Case
Management Conference set for September 26, 2006 be reset for October 17, 2006.
On September 13, 2006, the parties stipulated and the Court subsequently ordered that
Defe