District_of_Columbia___________

Loading ...
Global Do...
News & Politics
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 5 OUTPUT: Wed Jul 14 10:30:55 1993 / pssw02/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ 10/ cvrtpsp
1990 CP-2-10
1990 Census of Population
Social and Economic
Characteristics
District of
Columbia
U.S. Department of Commerce
Economics and Statistics Administration
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 56 OUTPUT: Mon Sep 21 14:33:12 1992 / node2/  F main F / 90dec/ all/ usst/ ack
The Decennial Planning Division, Susan M. Miskura, Chief, coordinated
and directed all census operations. Patricia A. Berman, Assistant Division
Chief for Content and Data Products, directed the development and
implementation of the 1990 Census Tabulation and Publication Program.
Other assistant division chiefs were Robert R. Bair, Rachel F. Brown,
James L. Dinwiddie, Allan A. Stephenson, and Edwin B. Wagner, Jr.
The following branch chiefs made significant contributions: Cheryl R.
Landman, Adolfo L. Paez, A. Edward Pike, and William A. Starr. Other
important contributors were Linda S. Brudvig, Cindy S. Easton, Avis L.
Foote, Carolyn R. Hay, Douglas M. Lee, Gloria J. Porter, and A. Nishea
Quash.
The Decennial Operations Division, Arnold A. Jackson, Chief, was
responsible for processing and tabulating census data. Assistant division
chiefs were: Donald R. Dalzell, Kenneth A. Riccini, Billy E. Stark, and
James E. Steed. Processing offices were managed by Alfred Cruz, Jr.,
Earle B. Knapp, Jr., Judith N. Petty, Mark M. Taylor, Russell L.
Valentine, Jr., Carol A. Van Horn, and C. Kemble Worley. The following
branch chiefs made significant contributions: Jonathan G. Ankers,
Sharron S. Baucom, Catharine W. Burt, Vickie L. Cotton, Robert J.
Hemmig, George H. McLaughlin, Carol M. Miller, Lorraine D. Neece,
Peggy S. Payne, William L. Peil, Cotty A. Smith, Dennis W. Stoudt, and
Richard R. Warren. Other important contributors were Eleanor I. Banks,
Miriam R. Barton, Danny L. Burkhead, J. Kenneth Butler, Jr., Albert A.
Csellar, Donald H. Danbury, Judith A. Dawson, Donald R. Dwyer,
Beverly B. Fransen, Katherine H. Gilbert, Lynn A. Hollabaugh, Ellen B.
Katzoff, Randy M. Klear, Norman W. Larsen, Peter J. Long, Sue Love,
Patricia O. Madson, Mark J. Matsko, John R. Murphy, Dan E. Philipp,
Eugene M. Rashlich, Willie T. Robertson, Barbara A. Rosen, Sharon A.
Schoch, Imelda B. Severdia, Diane J. Simmons, Emmett F. Spiers,
Johanne M. Stovall, M. Lisa Sylla, and Jess D. Thompson.
The Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, Daniel H.
Weinberg, Chief, developed the questionnaire content, designed the data
tabulations, and reviewed the data for the economic and housing charac-
teristics. Gordon W. Green, Jr., Assistant Division Chief for Economic
Characteristics, and Leonard J. Norry, Assistant Division Chief for Hous-
ing Characteristics, directed the development of this work. The following
branch chiefs made significant contributions: William A. Downs, Peter J.
Fronczek, Patricia A. Johnson, Enrique J. Lamas, Charles T. Nelson,
and Thomas S. Scopp. Other important contributors were Eleanor
F. Baugher, Jeanne C. Benetti, Robert L. Bennefield, Robert W.
Bonnette, William S. Chapin, Higinio Feliciano, Timothy S. Grall,
Cynthia J. Harpine, Selwyn Jones, Mary C. Kirk, Richard G. Kreinsen,
Gordon H. Lester, Mark S. Littman, Wilfred T. Masumura, John M.
McNeil, Diane C. Murphy, George F. Patterson, Thomas J. Palumbo,
Kirby G. Posey, John Priebe, Anne D. Smoler, and Carmina F. Young.
The Population Division, Paula J. Schneider, Chief, developed the
questionnaire content, designed the data tabulations, and reviewed the
data for the demographic and social characteristics of the population.
Philip N. Fulton, Assistant Division Chief for Census Programs, directed
the development of this work. Other assistant division chiefs were
Nampeo R. McKenney and Arthur J. Norton. The following branch and
staff chiefs made significant contributions: Jorge H. del Pinal, Campbell J.
Gibson, Roderick J. Harrison, Donald J. Hernandez, Jane H. Ingold,
Martin T. O’Connell, Marie Pees, J. Gregory Robinson, Phillip A.
Salopek, Paul M. Siegel, Robert C. Speaker, Gregory K. Spencer, and
Cynthia M. Taeuber. Other important contributors were Celia G. Boertlein,
Rosalind R. Bruno, Janice A. Costanzo, Rosemarie C. Cowan, Arthur
R. Cresce, Larry G. Curran, Carmen DeNavas, Robert O. Grymes,
Kristin A. Hansen, Mary C. Hawkins, Rodger V. Johnson, Michael J.
Levin, Edna L. Paisano, Sherry B. Pollock, Stanley J. Rolark, A. Dianne
Schmidley, Denise I. Smith, and Nancy L. Sweet.
The Data User Services Division, Gerard C. Iannelli, then Chief,
directed the development of data product dissemination and information to
increase awareness, understanding, and use of census data. Marie G.
Argana, Assistant Chief for Data User Services, directed preparation of
electronic data products and their dissemination. Alfonso E. Mirabal,
Assistant Chief for Group Information and Advisory Services, directed
activities related to the National Services Program, State Data Centers, and
preparation of training materials. The following branch chiefs made signif-
icant contributions: Deborah D. Barrett, Frederick G. Bohme, Larry W.
Carbaugh, James P. Curry, Samuel H. Johnson, John C. Kavaliunas,
and Forrest B. Williams. Other important contributors were Molly
Abramowitz, Celestin J. Aguigui, Barbara J. Aldrich, Delores A.
Baldwin, Albert R. Barros, Geneva A. Burns, Carmen D. Campbell,
James R. Clark, Virginia L. Collins, George H. Dailey, Jr., Barbara L.
Hatchl, Theresa C. Johnson, Paul T. Manka, John D. McCall, Jo Ann
Norris, David M. Pemberton, Sarabeth Rodriguez, Charles J. Wade,
Joyce J. Ware, and Gary M. Young.
The Geography Division, Robert W. Marx, Chief, directed and coor-
dinated the census mapping and geographic activities. Jack R. George,
Assistant Division Chief for Geoprocessing, directed the planning and
development of the TIGER System and related software. Robert A.
LaMacchia, Assistant Division Chief for Planning, directed the planning
and implementation of processes for defining 1990 census geographic
areas. Silla G. Tomasi, Assistant Division Chief for Operations, managed
the planning and implementation of 1990 census mapping applications
using the TIGER System. The following branch chiefs made significant
contributions: Frederick R. Broome, Charles E. Dingman, Linda M.
Franz, David E. Galdi, Dan N. Harding, Donald I. Hirschfeld, David B.
Meixler, Peter Rosenson, Joel Sobel, Brian Swanhart, and Richard
Trois. Other
important
contributors were Gerard Boudriault,
Desmond J. Carron, Anthony W. Costanzo, Paul W. Daisey,
Beverly A. Davis, Carl S. Hantman, Christine J. Kinnear, Terence D.
McDowell, Linda M. Pike, Rose J. A. Quarato, Lourdes Ramirez,
Gavin H. Shaw, Daniel L. Sweeney, Timothy F. Trainor, Phyllis S.
Willette, and Walter E. Yergen.
The Statistical Support Division, John H. Thompson, Chief, directed
the application of mathematical statistical techniques in the design and
conduct of the census. John S. Linebarger, Assistant Division Chief for
Quality Assurance, directed the development and implementation of
operational and software quality assurance. Henry F. Woltman, Assis-
tant Division Chief for Census Design, directed the development and
implementation of sample design, disclosure avoidance, weighting, and
variance estimation. Howard Hogan and David V. Bateman were
contributing assistant division chiefs. The following branch chiefs made
significant contributions: Florence H. Abramson, Deborah H. Griffin,
Richard A. Griffin, Lawrence I. Iskow, and Michael L. Mersch. Other
important contributors were Linda A. Flores-Baez, Larry M. Bates,
Somonica L. Green, James E. Hartman, Steven D. Jarvis, Alfredo
Navarro, Eric L. Schindler, Carolyn T. Swan, and Glenn D. White.
The 1990 Census Redistricting Data Office, Marshall L. Turner, Jr.,
Chief, assisted by Cathy L. Talbert, directed the development and
implementation of the 1990 Census Redistricting Data Program.
The Administrative and Publications Services Division, Walter C.
Odom, Chief, provided direction for the census administrative services,
publications, printing, and graphics functions. Michael G. Garland was a
contributing assistant division chief. The following branch and staff chiefs
made significant contributions: Bernard E. Baymler, Albert W. Cosner,
Gary J. Lauffer, Gerald A. Mann, Clement B. Nettles, Russell Price,
and Barbara J. Stanard. Other important contributors were Barbara M.
Abbott, Robert J. Brown, David M. Coontz, and John T. Overby.
The Data Preparation Division, Joseph S. Harris, Chief, provided
management of a multi-operational facility including kit preparation,
procurement, warehousing and supply, and census processing activities.
Plummer Alston, Jr., and Patricia M. Clark were assistant division
chiefs.
The Field Division, Stanley D. Matchett, Chief, directed the census
data collection and associated field operations. Richard L. Bitzer,
Richard F. Blass, Karl K. Kindel, and John W. Marshall were assistant
division chiefs. Regional office directors were William F. Adams, John E.
Bell, LaVerne Collins, Dwight P. Dean, Arthur G. Dukakis, Sheila H.
Grimm, William F. Hill, James F. Holmes, Stanley D. Moore, Marvin L.
Postma, John E. Reeder, and Leo C. Schilling.
The Personnel Division, David P. Warner, Chief, provided manage-
ment direction and guidance to the staffing, planning pay systems, and
employee relations programs for the census. Colleen A. Woodard was
the assistant chief.
The Technical Services Division, C. Thomas DiNenna, Chief, designed,
developed, deployed, and produced automated technology for census
data processing.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 2 SESS: 5 OUTPUT: Wed Jul 14 10:30:55 1993 / pssw02/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ 10/ cvrtpsp
1990 CP-2-10
1990 Census of Population
Social and Economic
Characteristics
District of
Columbia
U.S. Department of Commerce
Ronald H. Brown, Secretary
Economics and Statistics Administration
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Harry A. Scarr, Acting Director
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 83 OUTPUT: Thu Jun 10 10:16:31 1993 / pssw02/ disk2/ 90dec/ all/ all/ rstr
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Harry A. Scarr, Acting Director
Charles D. Jones, Associate Director for
Decennial Census
William P. Butz, Associate Director for
Demographic Programs
Bryant Benton, Associate Director for
Field Operations
Clifford J. Parker, Acting Associate Director
for Administration
Peter A. Bounpane, Assistant Director for
Decennial Census
Economics and Statistics
Administration
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402.
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 14 OUTPUT: Tue Sep 22 15:09:01 1992 / node2/  F main F / 90dec/ allexcph23/ st/ con
List of Statistical Tables ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
iv
How to Use This Census Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I–1
Table Finding Guide---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II–1
User Notes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III–1
Statistical Tables (For detailed list of statistical tables, see page iv.) ---------------------------------------------------
1
APPENDIXES
A. Area Classifications -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A–1
B. Definitions of Subject Characteristics ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B–1
C. Accuracy of the Data----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C–1
D. Collection and Processing Procedures---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D–1
E. Facsimiles of Respondent Instructions and Questionnaire Pages ---------------------------------------------------
E–1
F. Data Products and User Assistance -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F–1
G. Maps --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- G–1
CONTENTS
Page
iii
CONTENTS
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  1
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
LIST OF STATISTICAL TABLES
[An asterisk (* ) indicates that the table was omitted because there were no qualifying geographic area(s) or population group(s)]
Table
Page
1.
Summary of Social Characteristics:
1990
1
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
2.
Summary of Labor Force and
Commuting Characteristics:  1990
2
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
3.
Summary of Occupation, Income,
and Poverty Characteristics:  1990
3
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
4.
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
4
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
5.
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
5
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
6.
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
6
County
7.
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
7
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
8.
Summary of Social and Economic
Characteristics for White Persons
and for Households and Families
with a White Householder: 1990
8
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
9.
Summary of Social and Economic
Characteristics for Black Persons
and for Households and Families
with a Black Householder: 1990
9
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
Table
Page
10.
Summary of Social and Economic
Characteristics for American Indian,
Eskimo, or Aleut Persons and for
Households and Families with an
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
Householder: 1990
10
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
11.
Summary of Social and Economic
Characteristics for Asian or Pacific
Islander Persons and for
Households and Families with an
Asian or Pacific Islander
Householder: 1990
11
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
12.
Summary of Social and Economic
Characteristics for Hispanic Origin
Persons and for Households and
Families with an Hispanic Origin
Householder: 1990
12
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
13.
Summary of Social and Economic
Characteristics for White, Not of
Hispanic Origin Persons and for
Households and Families with a
White, Not of Hispanic Origin
Householder: 1990
13
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
14.
Summary of Social Characteristics
of American Indian, Eskimo, or
Aleut Persons for American Indian
and Alaska Native Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
iv
CONTENTS
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  2
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
15.
Summary of Labor Force and
Commuting Characteristics of
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
Persons for American Indian and
Alaska Native Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
16.
Summary of Occupation, Income,
and Poverty Characteristics of
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
Persons for American Indian and
Alaska Native Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
17.
Ancestry:  1990
15
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
18.
Nativity, Citizenship, Year of Entry,
Area of Birth, and Language
Spoken at Home:  1990
16
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
19.
Place of Birth of Foreign-Born
Persons: 1990
17
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
20.
Age, Sex, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability:  1990
18
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
21.
Fertility and Household and Family
Composition:  1990
19
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
22.
School Enrollment and Educational
Attainment: 1990
20
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
23.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Veteran Status:  1990
21
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
24.
Labor Force Characteristics:  1990
22
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
25.
Occupation of Employed Persons:
1990
23
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
26.
Industry of Employed Persons:
1990
24
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
27.
Class of Worker, Work Status in
1989, and Last Occupation of
Experienced Unemployed: 1990
25
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Table
Page
28.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons:  1990
26
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
29.
Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons:  1990
27
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
30.
Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over by Age:  1990
28
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
31.
Ancestry:  1990
29
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
32.
Nativity, Citizenship, Year of Entry,
Area of Birth, and Language
Spoken at Home:  1990
30
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
33.
Place of Birth of Foreign-Born
Persons: 1990
31
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
34.
Age, Sex, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability:  1990
32
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
35.
Fertility and Household and Family
Composition:  1990
33
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
36.
School Enrollment and Educational
Attainment: 1990
34
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
37.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Veteran Status:  1990
35
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
38.
Labor Force Characteristics:  1990
36
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
39.
Occupation of Employed Persons:
1990
37
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
CONTENTS
v
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  3
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
40.
Industry of Employed Persons:
1990
38
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
41.
Class of Worker, Work Status in
1989, and Last Occupation of
Experienced Unemployed: 1990
39
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
42.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons:  1990
40
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
43.
Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons:  1990
41
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
44.
Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over by Age:  1990
42
District of Columbia
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
45.
Age, Sex, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability by Race and Hispanic
Origin: 1990
43
District of Columbia
46.
Fertility and Household and Family
Composition by Race and Hispanic
Origin:  1990
44
District of Columbia
47.
School Enrollment and Educational
Attainment by Race and Hispanic
Origin:  1990
45
District of Columbia
48.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Veteran Status by Race and
Hispanic Origin:  1990
46
District of Columbia
49.
Labor Force Characteristics by Race
and Hispanic Origin:  1990
47
District of Columbia
50.
Occupation of Employed Persons by
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
48
District of Columbia
51.
Industry of Employed Persons by
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
49
District of Columbia
52.
Class of Worker, Work Status in
1989, and Last Occupation of
Experienced Unemployed by Race
and Hispanic Origin:  1990
50
District of Columbia
Table
Page
53.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons by Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
51
District of Columbia
54.
Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons by Race and Hispanic
Origin:  1990
52
District of Columbia
55.
Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over by Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
53
District of Columbia
56.
Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition of White
Persons:  1990
54
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
57.
Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition of Black
Persons: 1990
55
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
58.
Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition of American
Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut Persons:
1990
56
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
59.
Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition of Asian or
Pacific Islander Persons: 1990
57
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
60.
Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition of Hispanic
Origin Persons: 1990
58
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
61.
Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition of White, Not
of Hispanic Origin Persons: 1990
59
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
vi
CONTENTS
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  4
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
62.
Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability of White Persons:
1990
60
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
63.
Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability of Black Persons:
1990
61
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
64.
Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability of American Indian,
Eskimo, or Aleut Persons: 1990
62
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
65.
Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability of Asian or Pacific
Islander Persons: 1990
63
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
66.
Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability of Hispanic Origin
Persons: 1990
64
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
67.
Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability of White, Not of
Hispanic Origin Persons: 1990
65
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
68.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of White Persons:
1990
66
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
69.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Black Persons:
1990
67
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
Table
Page
70.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of American Indian,
Eskimo, or Aleut Persons: 1990
68
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
71.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Asian or Pacific
Islander Persons: 1990
69
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
72.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Hispanic Origin
Persons: 1990
70
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
73.
Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of White, Not of
Hispanic Origin Persons: 1990
71
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
74.
Labor Force Characteristics of
White Persons: 1990
72
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
75.
Labor Force Characteristics of
Black Persons: 1990
73
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
76.
Labor Force Characteristics of
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
Persons: 1990
74
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
77.
Labor Force Characteristics of
Asian or Pacific Islander Persons:
1990
75
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
78.
Labor Force Characteristics of
Hispanic Origin Persons: 1990
76
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
CONTENTS
vii
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  5
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
79.
Labor Force Characteristics of
White, Not of Hispanic Origin
Persons: 1990
77
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
80.
Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
of White Persons:  1990
78
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
81.
Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
of Black Persons: 1990
79
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
82.
Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
of American Indian, Eskimo, or
Aleut Persons: 1990
80
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
83.
Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
of Asian or Pacific Islander
Persons: 1990
81
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
84.
Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
of Hispanic Origin Persons: 1990
82
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
85.
Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
of White, Not of Hispanic Origin
Persons: 1990
83
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
86.
Occupation of Employed White
Persons:  1990
84
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
Table
Page
87.
Occupation of Employed Black
Persons: 1990
85
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
88.
Occupation of Employed American
Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut Persons:
1990
86
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
89.
Occupation of Employed Asian or
Pacific Islander Persons: 1990
87
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
90.
Occupation of Employed Hispanic
Origin Persons: 1990
88
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
91.
Occupation of Employed White, Not
of Hispanic Origin Persons: 1990
89
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
92.
Income in 1989 of White
Households, Families, and Persons:
1990
90
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
93.
Income in 1989 of Black
Households, Families, and Persons:
1990
91
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
94.
Income in 1989 of American Indian,
Eskimo, or Aleut Households,
Families, and Persons: 1990
92
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
95.
Income in 1989 of Asian or Pacific
Islander Households, Families, and
Persons: 1990
93
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
viii
CONTENTS
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  6
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
96.
Income in 1989 of Hispanic Origin
Households, Families, and Persons:
1990
94
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
97.
Income in 1989 of White, Not of
Hispanic Origin Households,
Families, and Persons: 1990
95
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
98.
Poverty Status in 1989 of White
Families and Persons:  1990
96
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
99.
Poverty Status in 1989 of Black
Families and Persons: 1990
97
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
100. Poverty Status in 1989 of American
Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut Families
and Persons: 1990
98
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
101. Poverty Status in 1989 of Asian or
Pacific Islander Families and
Persons: 1990
99
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
102. Poverty Status in 1989 of Hispanic
Origin Families and Persons: 1990
100
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
103. Poverty Status in 1989 of White, Not
of Hispanic Origin Families and
Persons: 1990
101
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
104. Selected Characteristics of White
Persons 60 Years and Over by Age:
1990
102
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
Table
Page
105. Selected Characteristics of Black
Persons 60 Years and Over by Age:
1990
103
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
106. Selected Characteristics of
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
Persons 60 Years and Over by Age:
1990
104
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
107. Selected Characteristics of Asian or
Pacific Islander Persons 60 Years
and Over by Age: 1990
105
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
108. Selected Characteristics of Hispanic
Origin Persons 60 Years and Over
by Age: 1990
106
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
109. Selected Characteristics of White,
Not of Hispanic Origin Persons 60
Years and Over by Age: 1990
107
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
110. Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition for Selected
Racial Groups: 1990
108
District of Columbia
111. Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability for Selected Racial
Groups: 1990
110
District of Columbia
112. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Employed Persons
for Selected Racial Groups:  1990
112
District of Columbia
113. Labor Force Characteristics for
Selected Racial Groups:  1990
114
District of Columbia
114. Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
for Selected Racial Groups: 1990
116
District of Columbia
115. Occupation of Employed Persons
for Selected Racial Groups:  1990
118
District of Columbia
CONTENTS
ix
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  7
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
116.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons for Selected
Racial Groups:  1990
120
District of Columbia
117. Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons for Selected Racial
Groups:  1990
122
District of Columbia
118. Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over for Selected
Racial Groups: 1990
124
District of Columbia
119. Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition for Selected
Hispanic Origin Groups:  1990
126
District of Columbia
120. Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability for Selected Hispanic
Origin Groups:  1990
128
District of Columbia
121. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Employed Persons
for Selected Hispanic Origin
Groups:  1990
130
District of Columbia
122. Labor Force Characteristics for
Selected Hispanic Origin Groups:
1990
132
District of Columbia
123. Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
for Selected Hispanic Origin
Groups:  1990
134
District of Columbia
124. Occupation of Employed Persons
for Selected Hispanic Origin
Groups:  1990
136
District of Columbia
125.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons for Selected
Hispanic Origin Groups: 1990
138
District of Columbia
126. Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons for Selected Hispanic
Origin Groups: 1990
140
District of Columbia
127. Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over for Selected
Hispanic Origin Groups: 1990
142
District of Columbia
128. Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition for Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
144
District of Columbia
Table
Page
129. Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability for Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
145
District of Columbia
130. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Employed Persons
for Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
146
District of Columbia
131. Labor Force Characteristics for
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
147
District of Columbia
132. Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
for Race and Hispanic Origin: 1990
148
District of Columbia
133. Occupation of Employed Persons
for Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
149
District of Columbia
134.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons for Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
150
District of Columbia
135. Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons for Race and Hispanic
Origin:  1990
151
District of Columbia
136. Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over for Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
152
District of Columbia
137. Ancestry:  1990
153
County
138. Nativity, Citizenship, Year of Entry,
Area of Birth, and Language
Spoken at Home:  1990
154
County
139. Place of Birth of Foreign-Born
Persons: 1990
155
County
140. Age, Sex, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability:  1990
156
County
141. Fertility and Household and Family
Composition:  1990
157
County
142. School Enrollment and Educational
Attainment: 1990
158
County
143. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Veteran Status:  1990
159
County
144. Labor Force Characteristics:  1990
160
County
x
CONTENTS
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  8
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
145. Occupation of Employed Persons:
1990
161
County
146.
Industry of Employed Persons:
1990
162
County
147. Class of Worker, Work Status in
1989, and Last Occupation of
Experienced Unemployed: 1990
163
County
148.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons:  1990
164
County
149. Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons:  1990
165
County
150. Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over by Age:  1990
166
County
151. Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition by Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
167
County
152. Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability by Race and Hispanic
Origin: 1990
168
County
153. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Employed Persons
by Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
169
County
154. Labor Force Characteristics by Race
and Hispanic Origin:  1990
170
County
155. Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
by Race and Hispanic Origin: 1990
171
County
156. Occupation of Employed Persons by
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
172
County
157.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons by Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
173
County
158. Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons by Race and Hispanic
Origin:  1990
174
County
159. Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over by Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
175
County
Table
Page
160. Social Characteristics for Selected
Racial Groups:  1990
176
County
161. Labor Force Characteristics for
Selected Racial Groups:  1990
177
County
162.
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
for Selected Racial Groups:  1990
178
County
163. Social Characteristics for Selected
Hispanic Origin Groups:  1990
179
County
164. Labor Force Characteristics for
Selected Hispanic Origin Groups:
1990
181
County
165.
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
for Selected Hispanic Origin
Groups:  1990
183
County
166. Ancestry:  1990
185
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
167. Nativity, Citizenship, Year of Entry,
Area of Birth, and Language
Spoken at Home:  1990
186
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
168. Place of Birth of Foreign-Born
Persons: 1990
187
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
169. Age, Sex, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability:  1990
188
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
170. Fertility and Household and Family
Composition:  1990
189
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
171. School Enrollment and Educational
Attainment: 1990
190
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
172. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Veteran Status:  1990
191
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
173. Labor Force Characteristics:  1990
192
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
174. Occupation of Employed Persons:
1990
193
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
175.
Industry of Employed Persons:
1990
194
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
176. Class of Worker, Work Status in
1989, and Last Occupation of
Experienced Unemployed: 1990
195
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
CONTENTS
xi
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  9
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
177.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons:  1990
196
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
178. Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons:  1990
197
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
179. Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over, by Age:  1990
198
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
180. Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition by Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
199
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
181. Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability by Race and Hispanic
Origin: 1990
200
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
182. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Employed Persons
by Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
201
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
183. Labor Force Characteristics by Race
and Hispanic Origin:  1990
202
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
184. Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
by Race and Hispanic Origin: 1990
203
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
185. Occupation of Employed Persons by
Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
204
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
186.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons by Race and
Hispanic Origin: 1990
205
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
187. Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons by Race and Hispanic
Origin:  1990
206
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
188. Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over by Age by Race
and Hispanic Origin: 1990
207
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
189. Social Characteristics for Selected
Racial Groups:  1990
208
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
190. Labor Force Characteristics for
Selected Racial Groups:  1990
209
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
191.
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
for Selected Racial Groups:  1990
210
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
Table
Page
192. Social Characteristics for Selected
Hispanic Origin Groups:  1990
211
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
193. Labor Force Characteristics for
Selected Hispanic Origin Groups:
1990
213
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
194.
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
for Selected Hispanic Origin
Groups:  1990
215
Place [10,000 or More Persons]
195. Ancestry, Nativity, Citizenship, Year
of Entry, Area of Birth, and
Language Spoken at Home:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
196. Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
197. Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
198. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Employed Persons:
1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
199. Labor Force Characteristics:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
200. Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status:
1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
201. Occupation of Employed Persons:
1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
202.
Income in 1989 of Households,
Families, and Persons:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
203. Poverty Status in 1989 of Families
and Persons:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
204. Selected Characteristics of Persons
60 Years and Over by Age:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
205. Social Characteristics by Race and
Hispanic Origin:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
206. Labor Force Characteristics by Race
and Hispanic Origin:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
207.
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
by Race and Hispanic Origin:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
xii
CONTENTS
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  10
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
208. Social Characteristics for Selected
Racial Groups:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
209. Labor Force Characteristics for
Selected Racial Groups:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
210.
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
for Selected Racial Groups:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
211. Social Characteristics for Selected
Hispanic Origin Groups:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
212. Labor Force Characteristics for
Selected Hispanic Origin Groups:
1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
213.
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
for Selected Hispanic Origin
Groups:  1990
*
Place [2,500 to 9,999 Persons]
214. Race and Hispanic Origin for the
Rural Portions of Counties:  1990
220
District of Columbia
County
215. Social Characteristics for the Rural
Portions of Counties:  1990
221
District of Columbia
County
216. Geographic Mobility, Disability,
Labor Force Characteristics, and
Industry for the Rural Portions of
Counties:  1990
222
District of Columbia
County
217. Class of Worker, Occupation, and
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
for the Rural Portions of Counties:
1990
223
District of Columbia
County
218. Race and Hispanic Origin for the
Rural Farm Portions of Counties:
1990
224
District of Columbia
County
219. Social Characteristics for the Rural
Farm Portions of Counties:  1990
225
District of Columbia
County
Table
Page
220. Geographic Mobility, Disability,
Labor Force Characteristics, and
Industry for Rural Farm Portions of
Counties:  1990
226
District of Columbia
County
221. Class of Worker, Occupation, and
Income and Poverty Status in 1989
for the Rural Farm Portions of
Counties:  1990
227
District of Columbia
County
222. Age, Fertility, and Household and
Family Composition of American
Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut Persons
for American Indian and Alaska
Native Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
223. Education, Ability to Speak English,
and Disability of American Indian,
Eskimo, or Aleut Persons for
American Indian and Alaska Native
Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
224. Geographic Mobility, Commuting,
and Industry of Employed Persons
for American Indian, Eskimo, or
Aleut Persons for American Indian
and Alaska Native Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
225. Labor Force Characteristics of
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
Persons for American Indian and
Alaska Native Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
226. Additional Labor Force
Characteristics and Veteran Status
of American Indian, Eskimo, or
Aleut Persons for American Indian
and Alaska Native Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
227. Occupation of Employed American
Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut Persons
for American Indian and Alaska
Native Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
228.
Income in 1989 of American Indian,
Eskimo, or Aleut Households,
Families, and Persons for American
Indian and Alaska Native Areas:
1990
*
American Indian Area
229. Poverty Status in 1989 of American
Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut Families
and Persons for American Indian
and Alaska Native Areas: 1990
*
American Indian Area
CONTENTS
xiii
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:34 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:NONE  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  11
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:30  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:31  META:CENSUS90*P2TOCB11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:37:49
Table
Page
230. Selected Characteristics of
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
Persons 60 Years and Over for
American Indian and Alaska Native
Areas: 1990
*
American Indian Area
231. Characteristics Before and After
Allocation: 1990
230
District of Columbia
232. Allocation of Selected
Characteristics: 1990
234
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
Table
Page
233. Allocation of Selected
Characteristics of American Indian,
Eskimo, or Aleut Persons for
American Indian and Alaska Native
Areas: 1990
*
American Indian Area
234. Percent of Persons in Sample:  1990
236
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Inside and Outside Metropolitan
Area
County
Place [2,500 or More Persons]
235. Percent of Persons in Sample for
American Indian and Alaska Native
Areas:  1990
*
American Indian Area
xiv
CONTENTS
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 41 OUTPUT: Thu Oct 22 08:58:24 1992 / node2/  F main F / 90dec/ allexcph23/ usst/ how
HOW TO USE THIS CENSUS REPORT
CONTENTS
Contents of the Appendixes --------------------------------
I–3
Graphics ---------------------------------------------------
I–3
How to Find Geographic Areas and Subject-Matter Data------
I–1
How to Use the Statistical Tables ---------------------------
I–2
User Notes-------------------------------------------------
I–3
INTRODUCTION
Data from the 1990 census are presented in several
different report series. These series are published under
the following three subject titles:
1. 1990 Census of Population (1990 CP)
2. 1990 Census of Housing (1990 CH)
3. 1990 Census of Population and Housing (1990 CPH)
The types of data and the geographic areas shown in
reports differ from one series to another. In most series,
there is one report for each State, the District of Columbia,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands of the United States
(Virgin Islands), plus a United States summary report.
Some series include reports for American Indian and
Alaska Native areas, metropolitan areas, and urbanized
areas. See appendix F for detailed information about the
various report series; additional 1990 census data prod-
ucts such as computer tapes, microfiche, and laser disks;
other related materials; and sources of assistance.
The data from the 1990 census were derived from a
limited number of basic questions asked of the entire
population and about every housing unit (referred to as the
100-percent questions), and from additional questions
asked of a sample of the population and housing units
(referred to as the sample questions). Two primary ver-
sions of questionnaires were used: a short form containing
only the 100-percent questions and a long form containing
both the 100-percent questions and the additional sample
questions. Appendix E presents facsimiles of the question-
naire pages and the respondent instructions used to
collect the data included in this report. Appendix F lists the
subjects that are covered by the 100-percent and sample
components of the 1990 census.
Legal provision for this census, which was conducted as
of April 1, 1990, was made in the Act of Congress of
August 31, 1954 (amended August 1957, December 1975,
and October 1976), which is codified in Title 13, United
States Code.
HOW TO FIND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS AND
SUBJECT-MATTER DATA
This report includes a table finding guide to assist the
user in locating those statistical tables that contain the
data that are needed. The table finding guide lists alpha-
betically, by geographic area, the subjects shown in this
report. To determine which tables in this report show data
for a particular topic, find the subject in the left-hand
column of the table finding guide and then look across the
columns using the headings at the top for the desired type
of geographic area. Below is an example of a table finding
guide.
I–1
HOW TO USE THIS CENSUS REPORT
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 2 SESS: 41 OUTPUT: Thu Oct 22 08:58:24 1992 / node2/  F main F / 90dec/ allexcph23/ usst/ how
Tables identified in the table finding guide with a refer-
ence letter in parentheses after the table number present
characteristics for racial groups or persons of Hispanic
origin. The tables without reference letters contain data for
the total population only. The table finding guide does not
include cross-classifications of subject-matter items, nor
does it distinguish among tables presenting data for all
persons or housing units and tables presenting data for
subgroups (for example, persons under 18 years or renter-
occupied housing units) unless it is necessary to locate the
subject.
Additional information to locate data within specific
reports often is provided in the headnote at the top of the
table finding guide and in the footnotes at the bottom of the
guide.
HOW TO USE THE STATISTICAL TABLES
Parts of a Statistical Table
The census data included in printed reports are arranged
in tables. Each table includes four major parts: (1) heading,
(2) boxhead, (3) stub, and (4) data field.
A typical census report table is illustrated below.
The heading consists of the table number, title, and
headnote. The table number indicates the position of the
table within the report, while the title is a brief statement
indicating the classification, nature, and time reference of
the data presented in the table. The headnote is enclosed
in brackets and is located under the title. It contains
statements that qualify, explain, or provide information
pertaining to the entire table. In some tables showing racial
and Hispanic origin groups, the headnote includes infor-
mation that data are presented only when certain population-
size criteria (thresholds) are met. (For more information on
thresholds, see the ‘‘User Notes’’ section.)
The boxhead is under the heading. This portion of the
table, which contains the individual column heads or
captions, describes the data in each vertical column. In the
boxhead of many tables, a spanner appears across and
above two or more column heads or across two or more
lower spanners. The purpose of a spanner is to classify or
qualify items below it or separate the table into identifiable
blocks in terms of major aspects of the data.
The stub is located at the left edge of the table. It
includes a listing of line or row captions or descriptions. At
the top of the stub is the stubhead. The stubhead is
considered to be an extension of the table title and usually
shows generic geographic area designations and restric-
tions.
In the stub, several features are used to help the user
better understand the contents of the table. Usually, a
block of data lines is preceded by a sidehead. The
sidehead, similar to a spanner, describes and classifies the
stub entries following it. The use of indentation in a stub
indicates the relationship of one data line to another.
Indented data lines represent subcategories that in most
instances, sum to a total. Occasionally in tables, it
is
desirable to show one or more single-line subcategories
that do not sum to the total. The unit of measure, such as
dollars, is shown when it is not clear from the general
wording of the data line.
The data field is that part of the table that contains the
data. It extends from the bottom of the boxhead to the
bottom of the table and from the right of the stub to the
right-hand edge of the page.
Both geographic and subject-matter terms appear in
tables. It is important to read the definitions of the terms
used in the tables because census terms often are defined
in special ways that reflect the manner in which the
questions were asked and the data were tabulated. Defi-
nitions of geographic terms are provided in appendix A.
Subject-matter terms are defined in appendix B.
Symbols and Geographic Abbreviations
The following symbols are used in the tables and
explanations of subjects covered in this report:
• A dash ‘‘-’’ represents zero or a percent that rounds to
less than 0.1.
• Three dots ‘‘...’’ mean not applicable.
• (NA) means not available.
I–2
HOW TO USE THIS CENSUS REPORT
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 3 SESS: 41 OUTPUT: Thu Oct 22 08:58:24 1992 / node2/  F main F / 90dec/ allexcph23/ usst/ how
• The prefix ‘‘r’’ indicates that the count has been revised
since publication of 1980 reports or that the area was
erroneously omitted or not shown in the correct geo-
graphic relationship in the 1980 census reports. This
symbol appears only in the 1990 CPH-2, Population and
Housing Unit Counts reports.
• A dagger ‘‘†’’ next to the name of a geographic area
indicates that there has been a geographic change(s)
(for example, an annexation or detachment, a new
incorporation, or a name change) since the information
published for the 1980 census for that area. This symbol
appears only in the 1990 CPH-2, Population and Hous-
ing Unit Counts reports. The geographic change infor-
mation for the entities in a State is shown in the ‘‘User
Notes’’ section of 1990 CPH-2, Population and Housing
Unit Counts report, for that State. The information for all
States appears in the ‘‘User Notes’’ section of the
technical documentation for Summary Tape Files 1
and 3.
• A plus sign ‘‘+ ’’ or a minus sign ‘‘–’’ following a figure
denotes that the median falls in the initial or terminal
category of an open-ended distribution. (For more infor-
mation on medians, see the discussion under ‘‘Derived
Measures’’ in appendix B.)
• A minus sign ‘‘–’’ preceding a figure denotes decrease.
The following geographic abbreviations are used in the
tables and explanations of subjects covered in this report:
• A ‘‘(pt.)’’ next to the name of a geographic area in a
hierarchical presentation indicates that the geographic
entity is only partially located in the superior geographic
entity. For example, a ‘‘(pt.)’’ next to a place name in a
county subdivision-place hierarchy indicates that the
place is located in more than one county subdivision.
(Places also may be ‘‘split’’ by county, congressional
district, urban/ rural, metropolitan area, voting district,
and other geographic boundaries, depending on the
presentation.) Other geographic entities also can be‘‘split’’
by a higher-level entity. The exception is a tabulation
block, which is unique within all geographic entities in
census products.
• BG is block group.
• BNA is block numbering area.
• CDP is census designated place.
• CMSA is consolidated metropolitan statistical area.
• MA is metropolitan area.
• MSA is metropolitan statistical area.
• PMSA is primary metropolitan statistical area.
• TDSA is tribal designated statistical area.
• TJSA is tribal jurisdiction statistical area.
• unorg. is unorganized territory.
• VTD is voting district.
Census tables often include derived measures such as
medians, means, percents, and ratios. More detailed infor-
mation about derived measures is provided in appendix B.
GRAPHICS
Charts, statistical maps, and other graphic summaries
are included in some 1990 census reports. If graphics are
shown in a report, they are presented immediately after the
‘‘User Notes’’ section.
USER NOTES
User notes include corrections, errata, and related
explanatory information. This section appears directly before
the statistical tables in census reports unless graphics are
shown. It presents information about unique characteris-
tics of the report and changes or corrections made too late
to be reflected in the text or tables themselves.
CONTENTS OF THE APPENDIXES
Appendix A—Provides definitions of the types of geo-
graphic areas and related information used in census
reports.
Appendix B—Contains definitions for the subject-matter
items used in census reports, including explanations of
derived measures, limitations of the data, and comparabil-
ity with previous censuses. The subjects are listed alpha-
betically. In reports that contain both population and
housing characteristics, the population characteristics are
described first, followed by the explanations of the housing
subjects.
Appendix C—Provides information on confidentiality of
the data, allocations and substitutions, and sources of
errors in the data.
Appendix D—Explains the residence rules used in count-
ing the population and housing units, presents a brief
overview of data collection operations, and describes
processing procedures used to convert data from unedited
questionnaires to final 1990 publications and tapes. This
appendix also clarifies the procedures used to collect data
for persons abroad at the time of the census, where
persons on military bases or away at school were counted,
how data were collected for persons in institutions, and
which citizens of foreign countries were included in the
U.S. data.
Appendix E—Presents a facsimile of the 1990 census
questionnaire pages and the respondent instructions used
to collect the data in this report.
I–3
HOW TO USE THIS CENSUS REPORT
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 4 SESS: 41 OUTPUT: Thu Oct 22 08:58:24 1992 / node2/  F main F / 90dec/ allexcph23/ usst/ how
Appendix F—Summarizes the 1990 census data products
program by describing the information available in printed
reports and in other sources, such as microfiche or com-
puter tape; and provides information on where to obtain
assistance.
Appendix G—Contains maps depicting the geographic
areas shown in this report.
I–4
HOW TO USE THIS CENSUS REPORT
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 197 OUTPUT: Wed Aug 18 09:48:10 1993   / pssw01/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ st/ tfg
TABLE FINDING GUIDE
Subjects by Type of Geographic Area and Table Number
Subjects covered in this report are shown on the left side, and types of geographic areas are shown at the top. For definitions of area classifications,
see appendix A. For definitions and explanations of subject characteristics, see appendix B. Race and Hispanic origin are indicated with reference
letters in parentheses after the table numbers. When a range of table numbers is shown together with a reference letter, there is one table for each
race and Hispanic group. Reference letters for population counts and characteristics by race and Hispanic origin are:
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
White; Black; American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut; Asian or Pacific Islander; Hispanic origin; White, not of Hispanic origin
American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut, All Asian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Asian Indian, Korean, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Hmong, Laotian,
Thai; All Pacific Islander, Hawaiian, Samoan, Guamanian
Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Other Hispanic origin, Dominican, Central American, Costa Rican, Guatemalan, Honduran, Nicaraguan,
Panamanian, Salvadoran, South American, Argentinean, Chilean, Colombian, Ecuadorian, Peruvian, Venezuelan, All other Hispanic origin
Race by Hispanic origin
Subject
The State
County
Place and (in selected
States) county
subdivision1
Amer-
ican
Indian
and
Alaska
Native
area2
Total
Urban,
rural, size
of place,
and rural
farm
Inside and
outside
metropol-
itan area
Total
Rural or
rural farm
10,000
or
more
2,500
to
9,999
SUMMARY CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . .
1-3, 8-13(A) 1-3, 8-13(A) 1-3, 8-13(A) 1-3, 8-13(A)
... 1-3, 8-13(A) 1-3, 8-13(A)
14-16
POPULATION COUNTS BY RACE
AND HISPANIC ORIGIN . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4-5(A-D)
4(A-D)
5(A-D)
6(A-D)
214(A),
218(A)
7(A-D)
7(A-D)
...
SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Age. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20, 34, 45(A),
110(B),
119(C), 128(D)
20,
56-61(A)
34,
56-61(A)
140, 151(A)
215, 219 169, 180(A)
196
222
Ancestry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17, 31
17
31
137
...
166
195
...
Disability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20, 34, 45(A),
111(B),
120(C), 129(D)
20,
62-67(A)
34,
62-67(A)
140, 152(A)
216, 220 169, 181(A)
197
223
Education:
School enrollment and type of
school, educational attainment . . .
22, 36, 47(A),
111(B),
120(C), 129(D)
22,
62-67(A)
36,
62-67(A)
142,
152(A),
160(B),
163(C)
215, 219
171,
181(A),
189(B),
192(C)
197,
205(A),
208(B),
211(C)
223
Fertility (children ever born) . . . . . . . . .
21, 35, 46(A),
110(B),
119(C), 128(D)
21,
56-61(A)
35,
56-61(A)
141,
151(A),
160(B),
163(C)
215, 219
170,
180(A),
189(B),
192(C)
196,
205(A),
208(B),
211(C)
222
Household and family characteristics:
Household type and relationship . . .
21, 35, 46(A),
110(B),
119(C), 128(D)
21,
56-61(A)
35,
56-61(A)
141, 151(A)
215, 219 170, 180(A)
196
222
Selected living arrangements,
unmarried partner households . . . .
21, 35, 46(A),
110(B),
119(C), 128(D)
21,
56-61(A)
35,
56-61(A)
141, 151(A)
... 170, 180(A)
196
222
Family type by presence of
own children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21, 35, 46(A),
110(B),
119(C), 128(D)
21,
56-61(A)
35,
56-61(A)
141,
151(A),
160(B),
163(C)
215, 219
170,
180(A),
189(B),
192(C)
196,
205(A),
208(B),
211(C)
222
Language:
Language spoken at home
(detailed list) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18, 32
18
32
138
...
167
...
...
Language spoken at home by
ability to speak English. . . . . . . . . . .
18, 32
18
32
138
...
167
195
...
See footnotes at end of table.
II–1
TABLE FINDING GUIDE
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 2 SESS: 198 OUTPUT: Wed Aug 18 09:48:10 1993   / pssw01/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ st/ tfg
Subjects by Type of Geographic Area and Table Number—Con.
Subjects covered in this report are shown on the left side, and types of geographic areas are shown at the top. For definitions of area classifications,
see appendix A. For definitions and explanations of subject characteristics, see appendix B. Race and Hispanic origin are indicated with reference
letters in parentheses after the table numbers. When a range of table numbers is shown together with a reference letter, there is one table for each
race and Hispanic group. Reference letters for population counts and characteristics by race and Hispanic origin are:
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
White; Black; American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut; Asian or Pacific Islander; Hispanic origin; White, not of Hispanic origin
American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut, All Asian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Asian Indian, Korean, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Hmong, Laotian,
Thai; All Pacific Islander, Hawaiian, Samoan, Guamanian
Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Other Hispanic origin, Dominican, Central American, Costa Rican, Guatemalan, Honduran, Nicaraguan,
Panamanian, Salvadoran, South American, Argentinean, Chilean, Colombian, Ecuadorian, Peruvian, Venezuelan, All other Hispanic origin
Race by Hispanic origin
Subject
The State
County
Place and (in selected
States) county
subdivision1
Amer-
ican
Indian
and
Alaska
Native
area2
Total
Urban,
rural, size
of place,
and rural
farm
Inside and
outside
metropol-
itan area
Total
Rural or
rural farm
10,000
or
more
2,500
to
9,999
SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS —Con.
Language:—Con.
Ability to speak English by age, in
households . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20, 34, 45(A),
111(B),
120(C), 129(D)
20,
62-67(A)
34,
62-67(A)
140,
152(A),
160(B),
163(C)
215, 219
169,
181(A),
189(B),
192(C)
197,
205(A),
208(B),
211(C)
223
Nativity, citizenship, year of entry,
and birthplace of foreign born:
Nativity, citizenship, year of entry,
area of birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18, 32
18
32
138
...
167
195
...
Birthplace of the foreign born . . . . . .
19, 33
19
33
139
...
168
...
...
Older population (60 years and over):
Living arrangements, educational
attainment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30, 44, 55(A),
118(B),
127(C), 136(D)
30,
104-109(A)
44,
104-109(A)
150, 159(A)
... 179, 188(A)
204
230
Place of birth and nativity . . . . . . . . . . .
23, 37, 48(A),
112(B),
121(C), 130(D)
23,
68-73(A)
37,
68-73(A)
143,
153(A),
160(B),
163(C)
216, 220
172,
182(A),
189(B),
192(C)
198,
205(A),
208(B),
211(C)
224
Residence in 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23, 37, 48(A),
112(B),
121(C), 130(D)
23,
68-73(A)
37,
68-73(A)
143,
153(A),
160(B),
163(C)
216, 220
172,
182(A),
189(B),
192(C)
198,
205(A),
208(B),
211(C)
224
Veteran status, period of service . . . . .
23, 37, 48(A),
114(B),
123(C), 132(D)
23,
80-85(A)
37,
80-85(A)
143, 155(A)
... 172, 184(A)
200
226
ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Class of worker, workers in family
in 1989. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27, 41, 52(A),
114(B),
123(C), 132(D)
27,
80-85(A)
41,
80-85(A)
147,
155(A),
161(B),
164(C)
217, 221
176,
184(A),
190(B),
193(C)
200,
206(A),
209(B),
212(C)
226
Commuting:
Means of transportation and
carpooling, travel time to work . . . .
23, 37, 48(A),
112(B),
121(C), 130(D)
23,
68-73(A)
37,
68-73(A)
143, 153(A)
216, 220 172, 182(A)
198
224
Place of work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23, 37, 48(A),
112(B),
121(C), 130(D)
...
... 143, 153(A)
216, 220 172, 182(A)
198
224
See footnotes at end of table.
II–2
TABLE FINDING GUIDE
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 3 SESS: 199 OUTPUT: Wed Aug 18 09:48:10 1993   / pssw01/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ st/ tfg
Subjects by Type of Geographic Area and Table Number—Con.
Subjects covered in this report are shown on the left side, and types of geographic areas are shown at the top. For definitions of area classifications,
see appendix A. For definitions and explanations of subject characteristics, see appendix B. Race and Hispanic origin are indicated with reference
letters in parentheses after the table numbers. When a range of table numbers is shown together with a reference letter, there is one table for each
race and Hispanic group. Reference letters for population counts and characteristics by race and Hispanic origin are:
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
White; Black; American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut; Asian or Pacific Islander; Hispanic origin; White, not of Hispanic origin
American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut, All Asian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Asian Indian, Korean, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Hmong, Laotian,
Thai; All Pacific Islander, Hawaiian, Samoan, Guamanian
Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Other Hispanic origin, Dominican, Central American, Costa Rican, Guatemalan, Honduran, Nicaraguan,
Panamanian, Salvadoran, South American, Argentinean, Chilean, Colombian, Ecuadorian, Peruvian, Venezuelan, All other Hispanic origin
Race by Hispanic origin
Subject
The State
County
Place and (in selected
States) county
subdivision1
Amer-
ican
Indian
and
Alaska
Native
area2
Total
Urban,
rural, size
of place,
and rural
farm
Inside and
outside
metropol-
itan area
Total
Rural or
rural farm
10,000
or
more
2,500
to
9,999
ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
—Con.
Income:
Income in 1989, median income in
1989 by selected characteristics,
income type in 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28, 42, 53(A),
116(B),
125(C), 134(D)
28,
92-97(A)
42,
92-97(A)
148,
157(A),
162(B),
165(C)
217, 221
177,
186(A),
191(B),
194(C)
202,
207(A),
210(B),
213(C)
228
Industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26, 40, 51(A),
112(B),
121(C), 130(D)
26,
68-73(A)
40,
68-73(A)
146,
153(A),
161(B),
164(C)
216, 220
175,
182(A),
190(B),
193(C)
198,
206(A),
209(B),
212(C)
224
Labor force:
Labor force status, presence of
own children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24, 38, 49(A),
113(B),
122(C), 131(D)
24,
74-79(A)
38,
74-79(A)
144,
154(A),
161(B),
164(C)
216, 220
173,
183(A),
190(B),
193(C)
199,
206(A),
209(B),
212(C)
225
Labor force status of family
members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21, 35, 46(A),
114(B),
123(C), 132(D)
21,
80-85(A)
35,
80-85(A)
141, 155(A)
... 170, 184(A)
200
226
School enrollment and labor
force status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22, 36, 47(A),
114(B),
123(C), 132(D)
22,
80-85(A)
36,
80-85(A)
142, 155(A)
216, 220 171, 184(A)
200
226
Occupation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25, 39, 50(A),
115(B),
124(C), 133(D)
25,
86-91(A)
39,
86-91(A)
145,
156(A),
161(B),
164(C)
217, 221
174,
185(A),
190(B),
193(C)
201,
206(A),
209(B),
212(C)
227
Last occupation of experienced
unemployed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27, 41, 52(A)
27
41
147
...
176
...
...
Older population (60 years and over):
Income in 1989, poverty status in
1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30, 44, 55(A),
118(B),
127(C), 136(D)
30,
104-109(A)
44,
104-109(A)
150, 159(A)
... 179, 188(A)
204
230
Poverty status:
All income levels in 1989, income
in 1989 below the poverty level . . .
29, 43, 54(A),
117(B),
126(C), 135(D)
29,
98-103(A)
43,
98-103(A)
149,
158(A),
162(B),
165(C)
217, 221
178,
187(A),
191(B),
194(C)
203,
207(A),
210(B),
213(C)
229
Work status in 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27, 41, 52(A),
114(B),
123(C), 132(D)
27,
80-85(A)
41,
80-85(A)
147,
155(A),
161(B),
164(C)
216, 220
176,
184(A),
190(B),
193(C)
200,
206(A),
209(B),
212(C)
226
... Not applicable for this report.
1The selected States are: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and
Wisconsin.
2Characteristics are shown only for the American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut households.
II–3
TABLE FINDING GUIDE
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 21 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 17 16:05:48 1993 / pssw01/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ 0/ usernote
USER NOTES
Additional information concerning this 1990 census
product may be available at a later date. If you wish to
receive these User Notes, contact:
Data User Services Division
Customer Services
Bureau of the Census
Washington, DC 20233
301-763-4100
Questions concerning the content of this report may be
directed to:
Population Division
Bureau of the Census
Washington, DC 20233
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANA-
TIONS OF DATA
GENERAL
User Note 1
Age Reporting—Review of detailed 1990 information
indicated that respondents tended to provide their age as
of the date of completion of the questionnaire, not their
age on April 1, 1990. In addition, there may have been a
tendency for respondents to round up their age if they were
close to having a birthday. It is likely that approximately 10
percent of persons in most age groups are actually 1 year
younger. For most single years of age, the misstatements
are largely offsetting. The problem is most pronounced at
age 0 because persons lost to age 1 may not have been
fully offset by the inclusion of babies born after April 1,
1990, and because there may have been more rounding up
to age 1 to avoid reporting age as 0 years. (Age in
completed months was not collected for infants under
age 1.)
The reporting of age 1 year older than age on April 1,
1990, is likely to have been greater in areas where the
census data were collected later in 1990. The magnitude
of this problem was much less in the three previous
censuses where age was typically derived from respon-
dent data on year of birth and quarter of birth. (For more
information on the design of the age question, see the
discussion on comparability under ‘‘Age’’ in appendix B.)
User Note 2
The user should note that there are limitations to many
of these data. Please refer to the text provided with this
report for further explanations on the limitations of the
data.
User Note 3
The estimated population totals for persons in group
quarters, specifically by group quarters type, that are
based on census sample tabulations may differ from
comparable figures shown in 100-percent tabulations. Such
differences result, in part, from sampling variability which
occurs because information was obtained from a sample
of the population rather than from all persons. Differences
also occur because of nonsampling errors which affect the
100-percent and sample data. Examples of nonsampling
errors include respondent and enumerator errors, process-
ing errors, and nonresponse.
The 100-percent data are the official counts and should
be used as the source for data on group quarters type
when the primary focus is on counts of the population in
group quarters, especially for small areas such as census
tracts/ BNA’s or blocks. When the group quarters popula-
tion is shown by characteristics covered only on a sample
basis (for example, education, labor force status, income,
etc.), the sample figures should be used within the context
of the sampling variability associated with them.
For more information on the limitations of 100-percent
and sample data for persons in group quarters and the
classification of group quarters type, see appendix B.
Reasons for the differences between 100-percent and
sample totals will be an important focus of post-census
research and evaluation.
User Note 4
Estimated population and housing unit totals based on
tabulations from only the sample questionnaires (sample
tabulations) may differ from the official counts as tabulated
from every census questionnaire (100-percent tabulations).
Such differences result,
in part, because the sample
tabulations are based on information from a sample of
households rather than from all households (sampling
error). Differences also can occur because the interview
situation (length of questionnaire, effect of the interviewer,
III–1
USER NOTES
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 2 SESS: 21 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 17 16:05:48 1993 / pssw01/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ 0/ usernote
etc.) and the processing rules differ between the 100-
percent and sample tabulations. These types of differ-
ences are referred to as nonsampling errors. (For more
information on nonsampling error, see appendix C.)
The 100-percent data are the official counts and should
be used as the source of information on population and
housing items collected on the 100-percent questionnaire,
such as age, race, Hispanic origin, number of rooms, and
tenure. This is especially appropriate when the primary
focus is on counts of the population or housing units for
small areas such as census tracts/ BNA’s, block groups,
and for American Indian and Alaska Native areas. For
estimates of counts of persons and housing units by
characteristics asked only on a sample basis (such as
education, labor force status, income, and source of
water), the sample estimates should be used within the
context of the error associated with them.
Many users are interested in tabulations of items col-
lected on the sample cross-classified by items collected on
a 100-percent basis such as age, race, sex, Hispanic
origin, and housing units by tenure. Given the way the
weights were applied during sample tabulations, generally,
there is exact agreement between sample estimates and
100-percent counts for total population and total housing
units for most geographic areas. At the State level and
higher geographic levels, sample estimates and 100-percent
counts for population by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin
and for housing units by tenure, number of rooms and so
on would be reasonably similar and, in some cases, the
same.
At smaller geographic levels, including census tract/
BNA, there is still general agreement between 100-percent
counts and sample estimates of total population or hous-
ing units. At smaller geographic levels, however, there will
be expected differences between sample estimates and
100-percent counts for population by age, sex, race, and
Hispanic origin and for housing units by tenure, number of
rooms and so on. In these cases, users may want to
consider using derived measures (such as means and
medians) or percent distributions. Whether using absolute
numbers or derived measures for small population groups
and for a small number of housing units in small geo-
graphic areas, users should be cautioned that the sampling
error associated with these data may be large.
Even though the differences between sample estimates
and 100-percent counts for these categories are generally
small, the differences for the American Indian, as well as
the Hispanic origin populations, are relatively larger than
for other groups. The following provides some explanation
for these differences.
State-level sample estimates of the number of Ameri-
can Indians are generally higher than the corresponding
100-percent counts. It appears the differences are prima-
rily the result of proportionately higher reporting of ‘‘Cher-
okee’’ tribe on sample questionnaires. This phenomenon
occurs primarily in off-reservation areas. The reasons for
the greater reporting of Cherokee on sample forms are not
fully known at this time. The Census Bureau will do
research to provide more information on this phenomenon.
For the Hispanic origin population, sample estimates at
the State level are generally lower than the corresponding
100-percent counts. The majority of difference is caused
by the 100-percent and sample processing of the Hispanic
question on the sample questionnaire when the respon-
dent did not mark any response category. When process-
ing the sample, we used written entries in race or Hispanic
origin as well as responses to questions only asked on the
sample, such as ancestry and place of birth. These proce-
dures led to a lower proportion of persons being assigned
as Hispanic in sample processing than were assigned
during 100-percent processing. The Census Bureau will
evaluate the effectiveness of the 100-percent and sample
procedures.
As in previous censuses, the Census Bureau will eval-
uate the quality of the data and make this information
available to data users. In the meanwhile, both 100-
percent and sample data serve very important purposes
and, therefore, should be used within the limitations of the
sampling and nonsampling errors.
User Note 5
Thresholds and Complementary Thresholds—To show
characteristics for a large number of racial and Hispanic
groups and to avoid using a large number of pages to show
characteristics for small population groups, population
thresholds are used in some tables in this report. Also,
complementary population thresholds are used in some
tables to avoid showing largely repetitive data for the White
population and for the White, not of Hispanic origin popu-
lation. Specifically, complementary thresholds are used to
limit the presentation of characteristics for the White
population when the population of races other than White
is small and for the White, not of Hispanic origin population
when the Hispanic origin population is small.
For example, assume that the threshold and comple-
mentary threshold are 1,000 in a table showing data by
race and Hispanic origin for counties. The threshold of
1,000 applies to each group, and in addition, the comple-
mentary threshold of 1,000 applies to White and to White,
not of Hispanic origin. Figure 1, shown on the next page,
illustrates how the threshold and complementary threshold
for race and Hispanic origin apply for a hypothetical
county. (For simplicity, it is assumed that the ‘‘Other race’’
population of the county is zero because characteristics
are not shown for the ‘‘Other race’’ population below the
State level.) Thresholds are calculated for each race and
III–2
USER NOTES
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 3 SESS: 22 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 17 16:05:48 1993 / pssw01/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ 0/ usernote
Hispanic origin population subgroup as shown
in
figure 2 below. (For more information on the race and
Hispanic origin categories, see appendix B.)
The Census Bureau provides data in greater subject-
matter and geographic detail on summary tape files (STF’s)
than in printed reports. Each printed report is derived from
a specific summary tape file. For data not shown in a report
because of the application of thresholds or complementary
thresholds, see the corresponding summary tape file. For
more information on computer tapes and other data prod-
ucts, see appendix F.
User Note 6
The Hispanic origin groups included in the category, ‘‘All
other Hispanic origin,’’ may vary among some data prod-
ucts. Persons of Hispanic origin are those who classified
themselves in one of the specific Hispanic origin groups
listed on the census questionnaire—‘‘Mexican,’’ ‘‘Puerto
Rican,’’ ‘‘Cuban,’’ or ‘‘other Spanish/ Hispanic’’ origin.
In the tables of this report, the category, ‘‘All other
Hispanic origin’’ includes only those persons who reported
‘‘other Spanish/ Hispanic,’’ and are not included in the
specific groups listed under ‘‘Other Hispanic.’’
In other selected data products, ‘‘All other Hispanic
origin’’ is a residual category that includes all persons who
reported any Hispanic origin group but were not tabulated
in any of the Hispanic origin groups listed in the table. (For
more information on Hispanic origin categories, see appen-
dix B.)
User Note 7
A processing error in Summary Tape File 4 affected the
data in tables 13, 54, 55, 103, 109, 135, 136, 158, 159, 187,
188, and 207 in this report. This error affected selected
income and poverty characteristics for the ‘‘not of Hispanic
population by race.’’
Corrected data will be produced at a later date. For
more information, contact the Income Statistics Branch on
301-763-8576 or the Poverty and Wealth Statistics Branch
on 301-763-8578.
User Note 8
In this report, counties containing no rural population
are shown in tables 214 through 217 but are excluded from
tables 218 through 221, showing rural farm. However, for
counties with rural population and no farm population, the
counties are shown in tables 218 through 221, with a dash
‘‘–’’ to represent zero for the corresponding data lines.
User Note 9
In this report, American Indian and Alaska Native areas
containing no American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut popula-
tion are not shown in tables 14 through 16, 222 through
230, and 233.
Figure 1. Thresholds and Complementary Thresholds
Race and Hispanic origin
Population
Characteristics
shown
Reason
All persons
15,300
Yes
Threshold does not apply to total population.
White
13,800
Yes
Threshold and complementary threshold apply. There are 1,000 or more
White persons, and there are 1,000 or more persons of races other
than White.
Black
1,100
Yes
Threshold applies. There are 1,000 or more Black persons.
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
100
No
Threshold applies. There are fewer than 1,000 American Indian,
Eskimo, or Aleut persons.
Asian or Pacific Islander
300
No
Threshold applies. There are fewer than 1,000 Asian or Pacific Islander
persons.
Hispanic origin (of any race)
300
No
Threshold applies. There are fewer than 1,000 Hispanic persons.
White, not of Hispanic origin
13,500
No
Threshold and complementary threshold apply. There are 1,000 or more
White, not of Hispanic origin persons, but there are fewer than 1,000
Hispanic origin persons.
Figure 2. Race and Hispanic Population Subgroups
Race
Hispanic origin
White
Hispanic origin (of any race)
Black
Mexican
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
Puerto Rican
American Indian
Cuban
Eskimo
Other Hispanic
Aleut
Dominican (Dominican
Republic)
Asian or Pacific Islander
Central American
All Asian
Costa Rican
Chinese
Guatemalan
Filipino
Honduran
Japanese
Nicaraguan
Asian Indian
Panamanian
Korean
Salvadoran
Vietnamese
South American
Cambodian
Argentinean
Hmong
Chilean
Laotian
Colombian
Thai
Ecuadorian
All Pacific Islander
Peruvian
Hawaiian
Venezuelan
Samoan
All other Hispanic origin
Guamanian
III–3
USER NOTES
  JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 4 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 17 16:05:48 1993 / pssw01/ disk2/ 90dec/ cp2/ 0/ usernote
User Note 10
Tables that do not apply threshold or complementary
threshold for racial and Hispanic origin groups include
places and county subdivisions based on the 100-percent
population counts for each place and county subdivision.
Tables that apply threshold or complementary threshold
for racial and Hispanic origin groups include places and
county subdivisions based on the sample population counts
for each place and county subdivision.
User Note 11
The data shown for ‘‘Total ancestries reported’’ is twice
the number shown for the total population. The count for
total ancestries reported includes two ancestries for each
person. For example, if a person reported a multiple
ancestry such as ‘‘German and Irish,’’ that response was
counted twice in the tabulations—once in the ‘‘German’’
category and again in the ‘‘Irish’’ category. Also, for a
person reporting only a single ancestry, the person was
tabulated twice—once for the reported ancestry and again
in the ‘‘Other ancestry’’ category.
The count for ‘‘Total ancestries reported’’ for compara-
ble geographic areas may differ among census data
products since, in some products, persons who reported a
single ancestry are counted only once and a second
ancestry is not tabulated. For more information, see the
discussion under ‘‘Ancestry’’ in appendix B.
User Note 12
In tables 217 and 221, the occupation data for the line
that reads ‘‘Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers, and
laborers’’ for employed females 16 years and over were
tallied incorrectly. The data were tallied for all employed
persons 16 years and over.
GEOGRAPHIC NAMES AND PRESENTATION
GENERAL
User Note 1
The latitude and longitude values shown by tick marks in
the margins of the County Subdivision Outline Maps in
appendix G are approximate. They are shown only for
general reference. They are displayed accurately on the
State and County Outline Maps.
III–4
USER NOTES
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:03 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:CENSUS90*P2TIPSDA11. 08/ 10/ 93  03:11:13  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  1
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:12:29  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:12:30  META:CENSUS90*P2TABLES11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:22:45
Table 1. Summary of Social Characteristics: 1990
[Data based on sample and subject to sampling variability, see text. For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text]
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size
of Place
Inside and Outside
Metropolitan Area
County
Place [2,500 or More
Persons]
All persons
Persons 5 years and over
Percent who speak a
language other than
English at home
Persons 25 years
and over
Total
Percent
foreign
born
Foreign
born per-
sonsm
Percent
entered
1980 to
1990
Native
per-
sonsm
Percent
born in
State of
residence
Percent
living in
different
house in
1985
Percent
living in
different
State or
abroad in
1985
Total
And do
not
speak
English
" very
well"
Persons
enrolled
in ele-
mentary
or high
schoolm
Percent in
private
school
Persons 16
to 19
yearsmPer-
cent not en-
rolled in
school and
not high
school grad-
uate
Persons
18 to 24
yearsm
Percent
enrolled
in college
Percent
high
school
graduate
or higher
Percent
with
bache-
lor’s
degree
or higher
Persons
under 18
yearsm
Percent
living
with two
parents
Children
ever born
per 1,000
women 35
to 44
years
The State
606 900
-------------------
9.7
57.6
43.6
46.5
23.4
12.5
5.1
16.1
13.9
41.9
73.1
33.3
34.8
1 460
URBAN AND RURAL AND SIZE OF
PLACE
Urban
606 900
------------------------------
9.7
57.6
43.6
46.5
23.4
12.5
5.1
16.1
13.9
41.9
73.1
33.3
34.8
1 460
Inside urbanized area
606 900
----------------
9.7
57.6
43.6
46.5
23.4
12.5
5.1
16.1
13.9
41.9
73.1
33.3
34.8
1 460
Central place
606 900
---------------------
9.7
57.6
43.6
46.5
23.4
12.5
5.1
16.1
13.9
41.9
73.1
33.3
34.8
1 460
Urban fringe
–
---------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
---------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 10,000 or more
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 2,500 to 9,999
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
-------------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 1,000 to 2,499
–
--------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of less than 1,000
–
--------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other rural
–
------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural farm
–
-------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
INSIDE AND OUTSIDE METROPOLITAN
AREA
Inside metropolitan area
606 900
----------------
9.7
57.6
43.6
46.5
23.4
12.5
5.1
16.1
13.9
41.9
73.1
33.3
34.8
1 460
In central city
606 900
----------------------
9.7
57.6
43.6
46.5
23.4
12.5
5.1
16.1
13.9
41.9
73.1
33.3
34.8
1 460
Not in central city
–
-------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Urban
–
--------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Inside urbanized area
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
-----------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
---------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside metropolitan area
–
---------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Urban
–
--------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Inside urbanized area
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
-----------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 10,000 or more
–
--------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 2,500 to 9,999
–
--------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
---------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
COUNTY
District of Columbia
606 900
--------------------
9.7
57.6
43.6
46.5
23.4
12.5
5.1
16.1
13.9
41.9
73.1
33.3
34.8
1 460
PLACE
Washington city
606 900
-----------------------
9.7
57.6
43.6
46.5
23.4
12.5
5.1
16.1
13.9
41.9
73.1
33.3
34.8
1 460
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:03 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:CENSUS90*P2TIPSDA11. 08/ 10/ 93  03:11:13  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  2
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:12:29  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:12:30  META:CENSUS90*P2TABLES11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:22:45
Table 2. Summary of Labor Force and Commuting Characteristics: 1990
[Data based on sample and subject to sampling variability, see text. For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text]
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size
of Place
Inside and Outside
Metropolitan Area
County
Place [2,500 or More
Persons]
Persons 16 years and overmPercent in labor
force
Female
Own children under 6
years in families and
subfamilies
Employed persons 16 years and over
Percent at work 35 or more hours
in reference week
Workers 16 years and over
Total
Male
Total
With own
children
under 6
years
Living
with two
parentsm
Percent
with both
parents in
labor
force
Living
with one
parentm
Percent
with
parent in
labor
force
Civilian
labor
forcem
Percent
unem-
ployed
Total
Male
Female
Percent
govern-
ment
workers
(local,
State, or
Federal)
Percent in
manufac-
turing in-
dustries
Percent in
carpools
Percent
using
public
transpor-
tation
Mean
travel time
to work
(minutes)
The State
66.3
-------------------
71.3
62.1
66.6
70.0
58.9
7.2
80.3
83.1
77.7
32.2
4.3
12.0
36.6
27.1
URBAN AND RURAL AND SIZE OF
PLACE
Urban
66.3
------------------------------
71.3
62.1
66.6
70.0
58.9
7.2
80.3
83.1
77.7
32.2
4.3
12.0
36.6
27.1
Inside urbanized area
66.3
----------------
71.3
62.1
66.6
70.0
58.9
7.2
80.3
83.1
77.7
32.2
4.3
12.0
36.6
27.1
Central place
66.3
---------------------
71.3
62.1
66.6
70.0
58.9
7.2
80.3
83.1
77.7
32.2
4.3
12.0
36.6
27.1
Urban fringe
–
---------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
---------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 10,000 or more
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 2,500 to 9,999
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
-------------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 1,000 to 2,499
–
--------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of less than 1,000
–
--------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other rural
–
------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural farm
–
-------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
INSIDE AND OUTSIDE METROPOLITAN
AREA
Inside metropolitan area
66.3
----------------
71.3
62.1
66.6
70.0
58.9
7.2
80.3
83.1
77.7
32.2
4.3
12.0
36.6
27.1
In central city
66.3
----------------------
71.3
62.1
66.6
70.0
58.9
7.2
80.3
83.1
77.7
32.2
4.3
12.0
36.6
27.1
Not in central city
–
-------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Urban
–
--------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Inside urbanized area
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
-----------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
---------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside metropolitan area
–
---------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Urban
–
--------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Inside urbanized area
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
-----------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 10,000 or more
–
--------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 2,500 to 9,999
–
--------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
---------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
COUNTY
District of Columbia
66.3
--------------------
71.3
62.1
66.6
70.0
58.9
7.2
80.3
83.1
77.7
32.2
4.3
12.0
36.6
27.1
PLACE
Washington city
66.3
-----------------------
71.3
62.1
66.6
70.0
58.9
7.2
80.3
83.1
77.7
32.2
4.3
12.0
36.6
27.1
2 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:03 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:CENSUS90*P2TIPSDA11. 08/ 10/ 93  03:11:13  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  3
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:12:29  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:12:30  META:CENSUS90*P2TABLES11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:22:45
Table 3. Summary of Occupation, Income, and Poverty Characteristics: 1990
[Data based on sample and subject to sampling variability, see text. For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text]
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size
of Place
Inside and Outside
Metropolitan Area
County
Place [2,500 or More
Persons]
Percent of employed persons 16 years and over
Median income in
1989 (dollars)
Median income in
1989 of year-round
full-time workers (dol-
lars)
Income in 1989 below poverty level
Percent of persons for whom
poverty status is determined
Manageri-
al and
profes-
sional
specialty
occupa-
tions
Technical,
sales, and
adminis-
trative
support
occupa-
tions
Service
occupa-
tions
Farming,
forestry,
and fish-
ing occu-
pations
Precision
produc-
tion,
craft, and
repair oc-
cupations
Opera-
tors, fab-
ricators,
and labor-
ers
House-
holds
Families
Per capita
income in
1989
(dollars)
Male
Female
All ages
Related
children
under 18
years
65 years
and over
Percent of
families
The State
39.1
-------------------
32.0
16.6
.4
4.5
7.4
30 727
36 256
18 881
28 950
25 202
16.9
25.0
17.2
13.3
URBAN AND RURAL AND SIZE OF
PLACE
Urban
39.1
------------------------------
32.0
16.6
.4
4.5
7.4
30 727
36 256
18 881
28 950
25 202
16.9
25.0
17.2
13.3
Inside urbanized area
39.1
----------------
32.0
16.6
.4
4.5
7.4
30 727
36 256
18 881
28 950
25 202
16.9
25.0
17.2
13.3
Central place
39.1
---------------------
32.0
16.6
.4
4.5
7.4
30 727
36 256
18 881
28 950
25 202
16.9
25.0
17.2
13.3
Urban fringe
–
---------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
---------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 10,000 or more
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 2,500 to 9,999
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
-------------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 1,000 to 2,499
–
--------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of less than 1,000
–
--------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other rural
–
------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural farm
–
-------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
INSIDE AND OUTSIDE METROPOLITAN
AREA
Inside metropolitan area
39.1
----------------
32.0
16.6
.4
4.5
7.4
30 727
36 256
18 881
28 950
25 202
16.9
25.0
17.2
13.3
In central city
39.1
----------------------
32.0
16.6
.4
4.5
7.4
30 727
36 256
18 881
28 950
25 202
16.9
25.0
17.2
13.3
Not in central city
–
-------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Urban
–
--------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Inside urbanized area
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
-----------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
---------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside metropolitan area
–
---------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Urban
–
--------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Inside urbanized area
–
------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Outside urbanized area
–
-----------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 10,000 or more
–
--------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Place of 2,500 to 9,999
–
--------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Rural
–
---------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
COUNTY
District of Columbia
39.1
--------------------
32.0
16.6
.4
4.5
7.4
30 727
36 256
18 881
28 950
25 202
16.9
25.0
17.2
13.3
PLACE
Washington city
39.1
-----------------------
32.0
16.6
.4
4.5
7.4
30 727
36 256
18 881
28 950
25 202
16.9
25.0
17.2
13.3
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 3
TIPSII [UPF]  GP211  CENSUS90  71583900  08/ 20/ 93  10:03 AM  MACHINE: C  DATA:CENSUS90*P2TIPSDA11. 08/ 10/ 93  03:11:13  TAPE: NONE  FRAME:  4
TSF:CENSUS90*92.  08/ 10/ 93  03:12:29  UTF:CENSUS90*93.  08/ 10/ 93  03:12:30  META:CENSUS90*P2TABLES11.  08/ 10/ 93  03:22:45
Table 4. Race and Hispanic Origin: 1990
[Data based on sample and subject to sampling variability, see text. For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text]
District of Columbia
Urban and Rural and Size of Place
Urban
Inside urbanized area
Outside urbanized area
Rural
The State
Total
Total
Central place
Urban fringe
Place of
10,000 or
more
Place of
2,500 to
9,999
Total
Place of
1,000 to
2,499
Place of less
than 1,000
Rural farm
RACE
All persons
606 900
-----------------------------
606 900
606 900
606 900
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
White
179 690
-----------------------------------------
179 690
179 690
179 690
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Black
399 751
-----------------------------------------
399 751
399 751
399 751
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
1 559
--------------------
1 559
1 559
1 559
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
American Indian
1 523
-------------------------------
1 523
1 523
1 523
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Eskimo
5
--------------------------------------
5
5
5
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Aleut
31
---------------------------------------
31
31
31
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Asian or Pacific Islander
11 233
---------------------------
11 233
11 233
11 233
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Asian
11 059
---------------------------------------
11 059
11 059
11 059
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Chinese
3 028
------------------------------------
3 028
3 028
3 028
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Filipino
2 065
------------------------------------
2 065
2 065
2 065
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Japanese
1 166
----------------------------------
1 166
1 166
1 166
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Asian Indian
1 598
--------------------------------
1 598
1 598
1 598
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Korean
935
------------------------------------
935
935
935
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Vietnamese
732
---------------------------------
732
732
732
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Cambodian
65
---------------------------------
65
65
65
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hmong
–
------------------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Laotian
33
------------------------------------
33
33
33
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Thai
275
--------------------------------------
275
275
275
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other Asian
1 162
--------------------------------
1 162
1 162
1 162
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Pacific Islander
174
--------------------------------
174
174
174
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hawaiian
89
-----------------------------------
89
89
89
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Samoan
34
-----------------------------------
34
34
34
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Guamanian
25
---------------------------------
25
25
25
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other Pacific Islander
26
-------------------------
26
26
26
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other race
14 667
-------------------------------------
14 667
14 667
14 667
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
HISPANIC ORIGIN
All persons
606 900
-----------------------------
606 900
606 900
606 900
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hispanic origin (of any race)
31 358
------------------------
31 358
31 358
31 358
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Mexican
3 071
-------------------------------------
3 071
3 071
3 071
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Puerto Rican
1 777
----------------------------------
1 777
1 777
1 777
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Cuban
1 187
---------------------------------------
1 187
1 187
1 187
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other Hispanic
25 323
--------------------------------
25 323
25 323
25 323
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Dominican (Dominican Republic)
1 524
------------------
1 524
1 524
1 524
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Central American
14 243
-----------------------------
14 243
14 243
14 243
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Costa Rican
242
-------------------------------
242
242
242
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Guatemalan
1 260
------------------------------
1 260
1 260
1 260
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Honduran
392
--------------------------------
392
392
392
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Nicaraguan
1 116
-------------------------------
1 116
1 116
1 116
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Panamanian
680
------------------------------
680
680
680
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Salvadoran
10 513
-------------------------------
10 513
10 513
10 513
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other Central American
40
----------------------
40
40
40
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
South American
4 837
------------------------------
4 837
4 837
4 837
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Argentinean
521
------------------------------
521
521
521
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Chilean
418
----------------------------------
418
418
418
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Colombian
876
--------------------------------
876
876
876
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Ecuadorian
741
-------------------------------
741
741
741
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Peruvian
1 079
---------------------------------
1 079
1 079
1 079
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Venezuelan
118
-------------------------------
118
118
118
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other South American
1 084
-----------------------
1 084
1 084
1 084
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
All other Hispanic
4 719
----------------------------
4 719
4 719
4 719
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Not of Hispanic origin
575 542
-----------------------------
575 542
575 542
575 542
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN
All persons
606 900
-----------------------------
606 900
606 900
606 900
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
White
179 690
-----------------------------------------
179 690
179 690
179 690
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hispanic origin
13 465
--------------------------------
13 465
13 465
13 465
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Not of Hispanic origin
166 225
---------------------------
166 225
166 225
166 225
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Black
399 751
-----------------------------------------
399 751
399 751
399 751
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hispanic origin
3 354
--------------------------------
3 354
3 354
3 354
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Not of Hispanic origin
396 397
---------------------------
396 397
396 397
396 397
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
1 559
--------------------
1 559
1 559
1 559
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hispanic origin
266
--------------------------------
266
266
266
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Not of Hispanic origin
1 293
---------------------------
1 293
1 293
1 293
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Asian or Pacific Islander
11 233
---------------------------
11 233
11 233
11 233
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hispanic origin
503
--------------------------------
503
503
503
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Not of Hispanic origin
10 730
---------------------------
10 730
10 730
10 730
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other race
14 667
-------------------------------------
14 667
14 667
14 667
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hispanic origin
13 770
--------------------------------
13 770
13 770
13 770
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Not of Hispanic origin
897
---------------------------
897
897
897
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
PERCENT DISTRIBUTION BY RACE
All persons
100.0
-----------------------------
100.0
100.0
100.0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
White
29.6
-----------------------------------------
29.6
29.6
29.6
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Black
65.9
-----------------------------------------
65.9
65.9
65.9
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut
.3
--------------------
.3
.3
.3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
American Indian
.3
-------------------------------
.3
.3
.3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Asian or Pacific Islander
1.9
---------------------------
1.9
1.9
1.9
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Asian
1.8
---------------------------------------
1.8
1.8
1.8
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Pacific Islander
–
--------------------------------
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other race
2.4
-------------------------------------
2.4
2.4
2.4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
PERCENT DISTRIBUTION BY HISPANIC ORIGIN
All persons
100.0
-----------------------------
100.0
100.0
100.0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Hispanic origin (of any race)
5.2
------------------------
5.2
5.2
5.2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Mexican
.5
-------------------------------------
.5
.5
.5
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Puerto Rican
.3
----------------------------------
.3
.3
.3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Cuban
.2
---------------------------------------
.2
.2
.2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Other Hispanic
4.2
--------------------------------
4.2
4.2
4.2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Not of Hispanic origin
94.8
-----------------------------
94.8
94.8
94.8
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
PERCENT WHITE, NOT OF HISPANIC ORIGIN
All persons
100.0
-----------------------------
100.0
100.0
100.0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
White
29.6
-----------------------------------------
29.6
29.6
29.6
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Not of Hispanic origin
27.4
---------------------------
27.4
27.4
27.4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
4 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS