IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 06-CV-02528-JLK-CBS
______________________________________________________________________________
CHRIS BRAY, et al.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
QFA ROYALTIES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
KANE, J.
This matter came before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion For Preliminary Injunction And
Request For Forthwith Hearing. Defendants subsequently filed a Motion For Leave To Take
Expedited Discovery And For Short Continuance Of Hearing, that was denied by written Order
of this Court on December 18, 2006. A hearing on the Plaintiffs’ motion was conducted on
December 22, 2006. Plaintiffs proceeded at hearing relying upon Declarations filed by eight of
the individual plaintiffs and one Declaration of a non-party, Ratti Baber. Defendants presented
_______ at the hearing.
The Court’s written Order of December 18, 2006 indicated that the scope of the
scheduled December 22, 2006 hearing would be to determine the request for a temporary
restraining order and also to conduct a status/scheduling conference on matters, including any
expedited discovery schedule, related to the conduct of a meaningful preliminary injunction
Case 1:06-cv-02528-JLK Document 21 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 6
Bray et al v QFA Royalties
Doc. 21
Dockets.Justia.com
2
hearing at the earliest available time. The Court also expressly admonished the Defendant to
undertake no action (or fail to take any action) before then that would operate to compromise the
Court’s ability to enter a meaningful temporary restraining order that would preserve the status
quo ante of the parties.
The sole issue plaintiffs have presented in this case is whether Quiznos exceeded its
authority by terminating t