Sovereign Defense Crown Office Act 2009

This law, by the short title “Crown Office Act”, establishes the official functions of Crown Officers of the Order, determines the status of its diplomatic and consular officials, and provides the juridical basis for legitimacy of diplomatic credentials and other official documents issued to Crown Officers. It also provides a parliamentary program for diplomatic service as a form of amnesty and asylum for persecuted political dissidents. An official legislative or regulatory Act or Law, enacted by the Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon, as the nation-state subject of international law embodying the original Knights Templar from 1118 AD.
About Knights Templar Order

The Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon, the direct continuation of the original historical institution of the legendary Knights Templar, founded in 1118 AD, fully restored as a sovereign subject of international law in 2013 AD, embodying the authentic Templar heritage.
Crown Office ORDER official Sovereign law International law Diplomatic Act governing Article Sovereign MAGISTRAL ORDER authority Diplomatic appointed subject ORDER constitute Article person present state protect foreign legal
About Knights Templar Order

1
Sovereign Defense
& Crown Office Act
OF THE
SOVEREIGN MAGISTRAL ORDER
OF THE TEMPLE OF SOLOMON
Ordo Regius Magistralis Templi Solomonis
Enacted by the Government and Ratified by the Grand Master
(Act of 2009, as Amended in 2016)
The text of this Act is the complete amended version, with all previous Acts, amendments,
sovereign orders and administrative regulations fully incorporated, as consolidated from all
traditional, customary and enacted sovereign protocols and laws of the Sovereign Magistral
Order of the Temple of Solomon since 1118 AD.
 2013, 2016 Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon.
All International Rights Reserved.
2
Preamble
Whereas, the Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon is a sovereign subject of
international law, exercising governmental rights and authorities as a non-territorial
principality of statehood, with legal and jurisdictional independence;
Whereas, the chivalric, ecclesiastical, nobiliary and sovereign legitimacy of the Order, and
juridical continuity from its original foundations, is established by documented facts of the
historical record and by recognized doctrines of customary international law;
Whereas, the proven historical purpose and established tradition of the Order is the function
of knightly service under the sacred Code of Chivalry to defend the disadvantaged, protect the
defenseless, and uphold the principles of good over evil for the advancement of civilization;
Whereas, the primary interests and functions of the Order and its government consist of
defending, upholding and advancing international law, human rights, the rule of law, and the
collective heritage of humanity;
Whereas, in the modern era those primary interests and functions of the Order are
pervasively under offensive attack by state-sponsored terror organizations, state-supported
criminal organizations, and corrupted state agencies and foreign governments, both overtly
and covertly;
Whereas, such systemic violations against the rule of law both warrant and require the
strongest possible legal protections for the defense of the sovereignty, security, rights and
operations of the Order and its Crown Officers;
The Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon has enacted the present juridical
law as a parliamentary Act, to provide for the national security and common defense of those
whose protection and welfare depend upon the official activities of our sovereign principality.
Article 1  Title & Enactment
1.  
The full title of this law shall be the "Sovereign Defense and Crown Office Act of 2009"
(as amended in 2016).  The short title shall be the "Crown Office Act" (hereinafter "Act").
2. 
This public law is duly officially enacted by the Government of the Order of the Temple
of Solomon (hereinafter "the Order") as a sovereign subject of international law, by approval
of its titled officials of the Grand Mastery, and by ratification by His Most Eminent Highness
the Prince Grand Master as Head of State.
3. 
The present Act comprises a fundamental body of public law defining the named
sphere of sovereign rights and authorities of the non-territorial principality, and thus
constitutes a binding multilateral contract and covenant between the Order, its Crown
Officers and other Subjects, and all third parties of the general public and the international
community.
3
4. 
The present Act also serves as public law providing benefits supporting the sovereign
rights and authorities of the Ancient Catholic Church, possessing its own autonomous
statehood as a sovereign subject of international law in its own right, as a Sister State under
Ecclesiastical and Sovereign Patronage of the Order, under Constitution Article 12.  For the
purposes of this Act, wherever applicable in context, all references to the Order, its
departments and governmental officials fully incorporate simultaneous or alternative
reference to the Ancient Catholic Church, and its analogous departments and pontifical
officials.
Article 2  Status of Crown Officers
1.  
A "Crown Officer" of the Order is defined as any person within the sovereign
governance of the Prince Grand Master who holds a titled position as Grand Officer (of the
Grand Mastery), Magistral Officer (of the parliamentary Government), Diplomatic Agent,
Consular Official or Crown Delegate, sovereign Nobility of the Order, any special chivalric
Title of Office of the Order under the Constitution Article 15.9, or any official Office of
Government under the Constitution Article 15.12.
2. 
Holding title of office as a Crown Officer of the Order is separate from and does not
require direct participation in the chivalric or ecclesiastical aspects of the Order.
(Constitution, Article 16.1)
3. 
Due to the multifaceted aspects of the Order as a secular state government,
ecclesiastical authority, sovereign house of nobility, historical institution, cultural and
humanitarian organization, the scope of official functions for all Crown Officers is not limited
to the apparent authority implied by their customary titles.
4.  
It is hereby established by law, that the sphere of official capacity of all Crown Officers
fully extends to many areas overlapping with the otherwise "personal" lives of those state
officials, including ostensibly "social" meetings, all forms of ecclesiastical activity,
professional "networking" through consulting or contracting, and supporting "commercial"
activity for the purpose of generating funds to support non-profit or governmental
operations, as well as all travel or transport to and from such events.
5. 
It is further established by law, that work for any non-profit organizations, and
participation in any spiritual or religious groups or activities, which are related to the
historical missions, governmental interests and functions of the Order, whether on a paid or
volunteer basis, also constitute officially sanctioned activities within the scope of official
functions of all Crown Officers.
6. 
All Crown Officers, regardless of the ostensible nature or implied sphere of their
formally issued Title of Office, are also charged with standing orders to remain on reserve
status as officers of state security, such that they may be called upon at any time to
implement, support or assist the defense of the Order as a sovereign subject of international
law.
4
Article 3  Credentials of Crown Officers
1. 
Due to the long-term context of the sovereign governmental, ecclesiastical, chivalric
and nobiliary responsibilities of the Order as a historical institution, appointments and
issuance of Title of Office to Crown Officers are effected on a long-term basis.  Official
appointments and credentials may be issued to Crown Officers on a lifetime basis, or
indefinitely without any expiration date.  However, all such documents issued by the Order to
all Crown Officers are subject to revocation at the will of the Sovereign Grand Master.
2. 
All credentials issued to Crown Officers, including identifying documents and any
appurtenant materials and accessories, constitute the exclusive physical property of the
Order, inherently carrying a strict obligation to return the property to the Order immediately
upon termination or discontinuation of active status of the type indicated on the printed
components of those materials.  Failure or refusal to honour an official request to return
credentials, by physically returning the materials within 30 days, carries a penalty of 10,000
GBP for each instance, in addition to all other applicable penalties arising under both civil
and criminal law.
3. 
By force of international law, all official credentials of Crown Officers must be
honoured by foreign authorities when presented, with all related rights and privileges
effectively invoked at the moment of presentation of credentials.
4. 
For subsequent verification or confirmation of the current active status of issued
credentials, beyond the statutory presumption of legitimate long-term validity, any interested
foreign authority may submit an inquiry to the Order (through its official website).  The Order
will issue a written statement in reply, within a reasonable timeframe without undue delay.
Article 4  Status of Diplomatic & Consular Officials
1. 
Appointment as a Diplomatic Agent, Consular Official or Crown Delegate of the Order
is separate from and does not require direct participation in the chivalric or ecclesiastical
aspects of the Order.  (Constitution, Article 16.1.)
2. 
Service as a Diplomatic Agent, Consular Official or Crown Delegate is separate from
and does not require holding Nationality in the Order as a nation-state.  (Constitution, Article
8.3)  Crown Officers may engage in Diplomatic service for the Order as a professional or
career undertaking, based upon possessing relevant qualifications.
3. 
Holding a Passport of Nationality in the Order is reserved solely for the separate and
limited purpose of having a valid travel document for practical use in international travel, and
is not a requirement of Diplomatic service.  By force of international law, Diplomatic
privileges and immunities are fully and effectively invoked by presentation of Diplomatic
credentials, without any requirement for a Passport travel document.  (UN Convention on
Diplomatic Relations, Articles 1, 3.1(a), 47.1, 13.)
4.  
Diplomatic Agents, Consular Officials or Crown Delegates of the Order as a sovereign
subject of international law shall generally be selected and appointed based upon the
following criteria:
5
A. 
Candidates for Diplomatic appointment must possess professional skills,
expertise and qualifications in one or more areas relevant to the functions and purposes of
their official capacity as a Crown Officer.  Diplomatic appointments are granted only to a
qualified individual with sufficient capabilities to effectively perform a relevant diplomatic or
consular function, as determined by the Government.  This element can be satisfied by the
candidate submitting a full and complete curriculum vitae (CV) with applicable supporting
credentials for review and approval by the Government.
B. 
Candidates for Diplomatic appointment must demonstrate professional
understanding of the history, cultural heritage, juridical bases, and sovereignty under
international law of the Order, sufficient to effectively and professionally represent the Order
as a principality of statehood, and to promote its lawful interests, powers and authorities, as
well as its contributions to humanity and the advancement of civilization.  This element can
be satisfied by the candidate signing a formal Affidavit and Certification stating that (s)he has
carefully read, thoroughly studied, and fully understood: (1) the Temple Rule as the founding
Charter of the Order, (3) the Constitution of the Order, (3) all Acts and Laws the Order, and
(4) all Templar Skills Training materials of the Order.
C. 
Candidates for Diplomatic appointment must meet an additional qualifying
requirement, that of demonstrating leadership in philanthropy, by substantial economic
sponsorship of non-profit humanitarian projects supported by the Order.  (Constitution,
Article 21.4-21.5).  This element can be satisfied by the candidate making, or by directly
causing or arranging, a fully tax-deductible financial contribution directly to a non-profit
organization indicated in writing by the Government at the time of appointment, in an
amount to be mutually determined with the approval of the Government.
5. 
As exceptions to the non-profit philanthropy criteria in Section C of the present
Article:  The Government may authorize a waiver of Section C in particular cases, if the
candidate is unable to contribute or procure direct sponsorship, but otherwise convincingly
demonstrates capability of and commitment to philanthropic leadership by undertaking
fundraising activities;  The Sovereign Grand Master at his sole discretion may waive Section C
in unique cases, if the candidate demonstrates extraordinary qualifications under Section A or
B, and if other compelling interests of the Order necessitate expedited Diplomatic
appointment.
6. 
Candidates for Diplomatic appointment may be nominated by any Grand Officer of the
Grand Mastery or any Magistral Officer of the Government, which in turn may be based upon
recommendation and referral by any Crown Officer.  To receive status with Diplomatic
Credentials, a candidate must be approved by a simple majority (more than 50%) vote of the
Government, followed by official ratification and royal appointment by the Sovereign Grand
Master.
7. 
Diplomatic appointments shall be issued for a period of 5 years, with renewal subject
to review of continued qualification under the initial issuing criteria, such renewals to be
issued for subsequent periods of 5 years.  Diplomatic appointments are subject to revocation
only on constitutional grounds or on the grounds of any substantial violation of the Laws of
the Order.  (Constitution, Article 22, Article 23.3.)
6
Article 5  Diplomatic Service as Amnesty & Asylum
1. 
As a sovereign subject of international law not having a central body of sovereign land
as territory analogous to a "country", the means and capacity of the Order for granting
physical asylum and sanctuary to persecuted persons is practically limited to its official
Embassy premises operating in foreign countries, as may be established from time to time,
and thus may be subject to visa protocols of the host countries for access to Embassy facilities.
2. 
Notwithstanding the physical limitations of Embassy premises, the Order has the
juridical capacity as a sovereign state to grant broader legal protection of amnesty and asylum
to political dissidents and victims of human rights violations located in foreign territories, by
exercising its lawful authority to grant Diplomatic status as a Crown Officer to such
persecuted persons.  Such official status may be granted whenever it is reasonably expected to
be effective in protecting persecuted persons while residing in or travelling between foreign
countries.
3. 
The use of Diplomatic service as a form of legal and political amnesty and asylum, as a
program, shall be based upon mandatory fulfillment of all normal requirements for
Diplomatic appointment as established by the present Act.
4. 
Any person granted Diplomatic appointment as a means of amnesty and asylum shall
agree to genuinely serve in that official role as a Crown Officer on behalf of the Order as a
sovereign principality of statehood.  Such role shall include assisting and facilitating
protection for other political dissidents, victims of human rights violations or persecuted
persons, in addition to contributing to the sovereign operations of the Order other relevant
skills and expertise which may be possessed by such person.
Article 6  Privilege & Protection of Crown Officers
1.  
All Crown Officers, as natural persons, are protected by sovereign immunity against
any and all civil or criminal liabilities, lawsuits or charges, directly or indirectly arising from,
relating or incidental to the performance of their official functions.
2. 
No foreign country, government, state agency or court shall presume to impose their
own conceptions of "official capacity", and no interpretation of what constitutes "official
functions" shall contradict the provisions of the present legislative Act, as applied to all Crown
Officers of the Order.
3. 
In the event of any uncertainty in particular cases, for the avoidance of debate or
dispute as to what in fact constitutes officially sanctioned activities within the lawful scope of
official authority acting in an official capacity, any interested foreign authority shall submit an
inquiry to the Order (through its official website).  The Government, either itself, through an
appropriate Ministry or by the Office of the Crown Registrar, will issue a written
determination in reply, within a reasonable timeframe without undue delay.  Only the
Government alone shall autonomously determine whether or not the activity in question falls
within the authority of protected official conduct.
7
4. 
Due to the rarity and uniqueness of the historical form of non-territorial principality of
the Order, being characterized by a traditionally small body of governing officials, the role of
all Crown Officers is broader in scope and higher in significance than may appear from their
customary titles.  Accordingly, all Crown Officers who additionally hold Diplomatic
Credentials are legally deemed "High Officials" of the government of the Order for the
purposes of international law.  By force of international law, such Crown Officers hold
absolute immunity, which is wholly exempt from any scrutiny by any foreign authorities of
the scope of their official functions and official capacity.  (ICJ Congo v. Belgium, 51-55.)
5. 
In the event that, due to discretion of modesty or operational confidentiality, the
sovereign status of a Crown Officer is not disclosed directly by presentation of credentials nor
indirectly by public constructive notice, foreign authorities shall not have liability for willful
or negligent violation of privileges and immunities of the Crown Officer.  However, once pre-
existing official status of a Crown Officer prior to the adverse action is disclosed, whether by
direct or public notice, the resulting invocation of sovereign privileges and immunities shall
have absolute and immediate effect, applying retroactively, such that any adverse action
against the Crown Officer must be terminated, retracted and corrected by all foreign officials
involved.
6. 
It shall be a criminal offense for any private person or foreign official, also carrying
liability for any private organization, quasi-governmental entity or government entity of
which such person or official is an agent, to disregard, undermine or otherwise violate the
protected rights, status, privileges and immunities of any Crown Officer as established under
conventional or customary international law.
7. 
Jurisdiction over any criminal offenses against a Crown Officer is vested in the
sovereign judiciary as the Magistral Courts of Justice or any appointed Court of Record of the
Order.  (Constitution, Articles 23-25.)  The provisions of the Sovereign Protection and Rule of
Law Act of 2010 shall apply to such criminal charges and legal proceedings, in addition to the
provisions of the present Act.
Article 7  Authorization of Self Defense for Crown Officers
1.  
Crown Officers are reasonably expected to foreseeably be in a position to exercise
sovereign authority, or to take official action, which directly results in protection of the
physical safety and security of other Crown Officers or Subjects of the Order, or of other
persons seeking asylum and sanctuary with the Order, including those who may be under
imminent threat of bodily harm.  Crown Officers whose titles or specialties may otherwise
appear to be unrelated to security may be called upon at any time to exercise their official
capacity for such protective or defensive purposes, in connection with various humanitarian
projects of the Order related to upholding and enforcing human rights and the rule of law
against unlawful adversity.
2. 
Due to the diverse nature of powers and authorities of Crown Officers of the Order, any
threat or act of unlawful interference with the rights and authorities of a Crown Officer,
hindrance of the performance or effectiveness of official functions or activities, or sabotage of
operational capabilities, is deemed to constitute a clear and present danger of imminent or
inevitable bodily harm to Subjects or protected persons under the sovereignty or temporary
asylum of the Order as a principality of statehood.
8
3.  
It is hereby established by law (on the basis of the legal facts set forth above in the
present Article), that any threat or act of unlawful interference, hindrance or sabotage made
to, against, about, pertaining to, or in the presence of a Crown Officer, thereby triggers and
invokes the right to "self defense", which fully includes the legal doctrine of "defense of
others".
4. 
It is further established by law, that in the event that a Crown Officer has a reasonable
belief based upon credible information of the occurrence or existence of any unlawful threat
or act, if such official in good faith has any reason to believe that the threat or act is likely to
result in bodily harm to the official or to any innocent third person, whether directly or
indirectly, whether imminently or inevitably, then such Crown Officer is fully authorized to
use armed or lethal force (including by use of lawful firearms), if deemed necessary to prevent
or deter the expected harm, in lawful and justified self defense or defense of others.
Article 8  Jurisdiction and Scope of Crown Proceedings
1. 
Notwithstanding sovereign immunities of the Government and Crown Officers of the
Order, the Order as a sovereign principality and its Crown Officers may be subject to legal
process exclusively within the provisions of the present Act.
2. 
Legal standing for any claim against a Crown Officer is limited exclusively to officially
recognized Nationals or other Subjects of the Order.  No other third parties shall have legal
standing to bring any claim. Any claim of such parties which by force of international law are
subject to exclusive application of the present Act are thereby extinguished, and cannot be the
subject of any process by any foreign state.
3. 
Subject matter of any claims against a Crown Officer is limited exclusively to liabilities
arising from obligations, duties or actions, as established by the Bill of Rights (Constitution,
Article 28) and traditional jurisprudence at common law.
4. 
Jurisdiction over any and all civil claims or criminal complaints against a Crown
Officer is exclusively vested in the sovereign Judiciary as the Magistral Courts of Justice or
any appointed Court of Record of the Order.  (Constitution, Articles 23-25.)
5. 
While Crown Officers may be the subject of legal process, obligated to respond for the
administration of Justice, they shall not have any personal civil liability to any private
claimants, nor any criminal liability to any foreign state, but rather the Order itself shall
honour and satisfy any judicial awards resulting from a civil claim, and only the Order itself
may enforce any punitive measures resulting from criminal charges.
6. 
Crown Officers shall have personal liability only to the Order itself, such that the Order
may privately bring a claim against its own Crown Officer for any damages incurred by the
Order in satisfying a judgment award to third parties arising from any breach of obligations
or liabilities created from any unauthorized actions by the Crown Officer.
9
Enactment & Ratification
The present Sovereign Defense and Crown Office Act of 2009, as Amended in 2016, is hereby
fully enacted and ratified, in accordance with Article 20 of the Constitution, by the following
legal acts of the Government and Grand Mastery:
Enacted by the Government:
____________________________________ 03 March 2016
His Excellency Viscount Michael Henry Dunn
Grand Commander as Chairman of the Government
Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon
Ratified by Magistral Assent of the Grand Master:
____________________________________ 03 March 2016
His Most Eminent Highness Prince Matthew of Thebes
Sovereign Grand Master as Head of State
Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon